Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Urban Development and Vernacular Religious Landscapes in Seoul

Sarfati, Liora·2018·The Palgrave Handbook of Urban Ethnography

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-64289-5_28

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Abelmann, Nancy. 2003. The Melodrama of Mobility: Women, Talk, and Class in Contemporary South Korea. Honolulu: Hawaii University Press. · doi:10.1515/9780824864859
  2. Aitken, Stuart C. 2014. The Ethnopoetics of Space and Transformation. Farnham: Ashgate.
  3. Behrend, Heike, Anja Dreschke, and Martin Zillinger. 2015. Trance Mediums and New Media: Spirit Possession in the Age of Technical Reproduction. New York: Fordham University Press.
  4. Channa, Subhadra M. 2013. Comments and Reflections. Urbanities 3 (2): 122–123. www.anthrojournal-urbanities.com
  5. Cosgrove, Denis E. 2006. Social Formation and Symbolic Landscape: Modernity, Community and the Landscape Idea. Journal of Material Culture 11 (1–2): 49–66. · doi:10.1177/1359183506062992
  6. Fischer, Michael D. 2008. Cultural Dynamics: Formal Descriptions of Cultural Processes. Structure and Dynamics 3 (2). http://escholarship.org/uc/item/557126nz · doi:10.5070/sd932003299
  7. Florida, Richard. 2002. The Rise of the Creative Class: And How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books.
  8. Glassie, Henry. 1995. Tradition. Journal of American Folklore 108 (430): 395–412. · doi:10.2307/541653
  9. Grayson, James H. 1992. The Accommodation of Korean Folk Religion to the Religious Forms of Buddhism: An Example of Reverse Syncretism. Asian Folklore Studies 51 (2): 199–217. · DOI
  10. Herzfeld, Michael. 2013. Comments and Reflections. Urbanities 3 (2): 118–120. www.anthrojournal-urbanities.com
  11. Howard, Robert G. 2006. Sustainability and Narrative Plasticity in Online Apocalyptic Discourse After September 11, 2001. Journal of Media and Religion 5 (1): 25–47. · doi:10.1207/s15328415jmr0501_2
  12. ———. 2011. Digital Jesus: The Making of a New Christian Fundamentalist Community on the Internet. New York: New York University Press. · doi:10.18574/nyu/9780814773086.001.0001
  13. Im, Chae-hae. 1996. Meaning of Water in Korean Folk Religion. Koreana 10 (3): 32–39.
  14. Ingold, Tim. 1993. The Temporality of the Landscape. World Archaeology 25 (2): 24–174. · DOI · Paper page
  15. Jameson, Fredric. 1991. Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  16. Janelli, Dawnhee Y. 1980. The Strategies of a Korean Fortuneteller. Korea Journal 20 (6): 8–14.
  17. Kendall, Laurel. 1985. Shamans, Housewives, and Other Restless Spirits: Women in Korean Ritual Life. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. · DOI · Paper page
  18. ———. 1996. Korean Shamans and the Spirits of Capitalism. American Anthropologist 98 (3): 512–552. · DOI
  19. Kendall, Laurel, Jongsung Yang, and Yul Soo Yoon. 2015. God Pictures in Korean Contexts: The Ownership and Meaning of Shaman Paintings. Honolulu: Hawaii University Press. · doi:10.1515/9780824857097
  20. Kim, Chongho. 2003. Korean Shamanism: The Cultural Paradox. Farnham: Ashgate.
  21. Kim, David J. 2015. Visions and Stones: Spirit Matters and the Charm of Small Things in South Korean Shamanic Rock Divination. Anthropology and Humanism 40: 1–19. · DOI
  22. Lee, Sungkyung. 2012. A Site from Seen to Contextualized: Urban Place in Busan, South Korea. Journal of Urban Design 17 (4): 533–548. · DOI
  23. Mittell, Jason. 2003. Audiences Talking Genre: Television Talk Shows and Cultural Hierarchies. Journal of Popular Film and Television 31 (1): 36–46. · doi:10.1080/01956050309602867
  24. Nelson, Laura C. 2000. Measured Excess: Status, Gender, and Consumer Nationalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
  25. Pardo, Italo. 1996. Managing Existence in Naples: Morality, Action and Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511621802
  26. Pile, Steve. 2005. Real Cities: Modernity, Space and the Phantasmagorias of City Life. New York: Sage. · doi:10.4135/9781446220665
  27. Prato, Giuliana B., and Italo Pardo. 2013. Urban Anthropology. Urbanities 3 (2): 89–110. www.anthrojournal-urbanities.com
  28. Primiano, Leonard N. 1995. Vernacular Religion and the Search for Method in Religious Folklife. Western Folklore 54 (1): 37–56. · DOI · Paper page
  29. Sarfati, Liora. 2014. New Technologies in Korean Shamanism: Cultural Innovation and Preservation of Tradition. In Performance Studies in Motion, ed. Citron Atay, David Zerbib, and Sharon Aronson-Lehavi, 233–245. London: Bloomsbury Methuen Drama. · doi:10.5040/9781408184707.ch-017
  30. ———. 2016. Shifting Agencies Through New Media: New Social Statuses for Female Korean Shamans. Journal of Korean Studies 21 (1): 179–212. · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Sarfati, L.
Affiliations
Tel Aviv University (IL)
Corresponding author
Sarfati, Liora
Venue
The Palgrave Handbook of Urban Ethnography
Published
2017-11-15
Pages
499-517
OpenAlex
W2769593423
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Religious Tourism and Spaces
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
Keywords
vernacular religion, urban development, religious landscape, Seoul, mediumship, divination, urbanization, land prices, zoning, religious practice, media representation of religion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Urban Development and Vernacular Religious Landscapes in Seoul. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-319-64289-5_28
The paper
Sarfati, L. (2018). Urban Development and Vernacular Religious Landscapes in Seoul. The Palgrave Handbook of Urban Ethnography. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64289-5_28

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.