CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 25

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Auto-ethnography and the Study of Affect and Emotion in World Politics: Investigating Security Discourses at London’s Imperial War Museum

Reeves, Audrey·2018·Researching Emotions in International Relations
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-65575-8_5
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-65575-8_5

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 53

  1. Amoureux, J. L., & Steele, B. J. (Eds.). (2015). Reflexivity and International Relations: Positionality, Critique, and Practice. Abingdon, Oxon and New York: Routledge.
  2. Anderson, K., & Smith, S. J. (2001). Editorial: Emotional Geographies. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 26(1), 7–10. · DOI
  3. Brigg, M., & Bleiker, R. (2010). Autoethnographic International Relations: Exploring the Self as a Source of Knowledge. Review of International Studies, 36(3), 779–798. · DOI
  4. Büscher, M., Urry, J., & Witchger, K. (2011). Mobile Methods. Abingdon, Oxon and New York: Routledge.
  5. Campbell, D. (1998). Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  6. Carver, T. (2002). Discourse Analysis and the “Linguistic Turn”. European Political Science, 2(1), 50–53. · DOI
  7. Cohn, C. (2006). Motives and Methods: Using Multi-sited Ethnography to Study US National Security Discourses. In B. A. Ackerly, M. Stern, & J. True (Eds.), Feminist Methodologies for International Relations (pp. 91–107). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. · DOI
  8. Dauphinee, E. (2010). The Ethics of Autoethnography. Review of International Studies, 36(3), 799–818. · DOI
  9. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1980). Mille Plateaux. Paris: Éditions de minuit.
  10. Doty, R. L. (1993). Foreign Policy as Social Construction: A Post-positivist Analysis of U.S. Counterinsurgency Policy in the Philippines. International Studies Quarterly, 37(3), 297–320. · DOI
  11. Doty, R. L. (2010). Autoethnography – Making Human Connections. Review of International Studies, 36(4), 1047–1050. · DOI
  12. Duffield, M. (2010). The Liberal Way of Development and the Development—Security Impasse: Exploring the Global Life-Chance Divide. Security Dialogue, 41(1), 53–76. · DOI
  13. Eriksson Baaz, M., & Stern, M. (2013). Sexual Violence as a Weapon of War?: Perceptions, Prescriptions, Problems in the Congo and Beyond. Uppsala: Nordiska Afrikainstitutet; London: Zed Books. · DOI
  14. Eriksson Baaz, M., & Stern, M. (2016). Researching Wartime Rape in the Democratic Republic of Congo: A Methodology of Unease. In A. T. R. Wibben (Ed.), Researching War: Feminist Methods, Ethics and Politics (pp. 117–140). Abingdon, Oxon and New York: Routledge. · DOI
  15. Fitzgerald, J. (2015). Why Me? An Autoethnographic Account of the Bizarre Logic of Counterterrorism. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 8(1), 163–180. · DOI
  16. Foucault, M. (2002 [1969]). Archaeology of Knowledge. London and New York: Routledge.
  17. Fullagar, S. (2001). Encountering Otherness Embodied Affect in Alphonso Lingis’ Travel Writing. Tourist Studies, 1(2), 171–183. · DOI
  18. Hansen, L. (2006). Research Designs: Asking Questions and Choosing Texts. In Security as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War (pp. 73–92). London: Routledge.
  19. Hatch, W. (2014). Bloody Memories: Affect and Effect of World War II Museums in China and Japan. Peace & Change, 39(3), 366–394. · DOI
  20. Holland, J. (2015). Constructing Crises and Articulating Affect After 9/11. In Emotions, Politics, and War (pp. 167–181). London and New York: Routledge.
  21. Holland, J., & Solomon, T. (2014). Affect Is What States Make of It: Articulating Everyday Experiences of 9/11. Critical Studies on Security, 2(3), 262–277. · DOI
  22. Imperial War Museums. (2014b). Annual Report and Account 2013–2014. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
  23. Inayatullah, N. (2011). Falling and Flying: An Introduction. In N. Inayatullah (Ed.), Autobiographical International Relations: I, IR (pp. 1–12). Abingdon, Oxon and New York: Routledge.
  24. Jauhola, M. (2015). On “Being Bored”: Street Ethnography on Emotions in Banda Aceh After the Tsunami and Conflict. In Emotions, Politics and War (pp. 86–99). Abingdon, Oxon and New York: Routledge.
  25. Jonas, H. (2001 [1966]). The Phenomenon of Life: Toward a Philosophical Biology. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
  26. Kavanagh, D. (2004). Ocularcentrism and Its Others: A Framework for Metatheoretical Analysis. Organization Studies, 25(3), 445–464. · DOI
  27. Laclau, E. (2004). Glimpsing the Future. In S. Critchley & O. Marchart (Eds.), Laclau: A Critical Reader (pp. 279–328). Abingdon, Oxon and New York: Routledge.
  28. Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (2001). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.
  29. Levin, D. M. (1999). Introduction. In Sites of Vision: The Discursive Construction of Sight in the History of Philosophy (pp. 1–68). Boston: MIT Press. · DOI
  30. Lisle, D. (2000). Consuming Danger: Reimagining the War/Tourism Divide. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 25(1), 91–116. · DOI
  31. Lisle, D. (2006a). Sublime Lessons: Education and Ambivalence in War Exhibitions. Millennium – Journal of International Studies, 34(3), 841–862. · DOI
  32. Lisle, D. (2006b). The Global Politics of Contemporary Travel Writing. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. · DOI
  33. Lisle, D. (2013). Frontline Leisure: Securitizing Tourism in the War on Terror. Security Dialogue, 44(2), 127–146. · DOI
  34. London & Partners. (2015, May 20). London Welcomes 17.4 Million International Visitors in Another Record-Breaking Year for Tourism. Retrieved May 21, 2015, from http://www.londonandpartners.com/media-centre/press-releases/2015/150520-london-welcomes-174-million-international-visitors-in-another-recordbreaking-year-for-tourism
  35. Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Durham: Duke University Press. · DOI · Paper page
  36. McCormack, D. P. (2003). An Event of Geographical Ethics in Spaces of Affect. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 28(4), 488–507. · DOI
  37. Mulvey, L. (2006 [1975]). Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema. In Media and Cultural Studies (pp. 342–352). Malden, MA, Oxford, Carlton: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
  38. Parashar, S. (2015). Anger, War and Feminist Storytelling. In T. Gregory & L. Ahäll (Eds.), Emotions, Politics and War (pp. 71–85). Abingdon, Oxon and New York: Routledge.
  39. Pile, S. (2010). Emotions and Affect in Recent Human Geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 35(1), 5–20. · DOI
  40. Powell, R., & Kokkranikal, J. (2015). Motivations and Experiences of Museum Visitors: The Case of the Imperial War Museum, United Kingdom. In V. Katsoni (Ed.), Cultural Tourism in a Digital Era (pp. 169–181). Athens: Springer International Publishing. · DOI
  41. Robben, A. C. G. M. (1995). The Politics of Truth and Emotion Among Victims and Perpetrators of Violence. In Fieldwork Under Fire: Contemporary Studies of Violence and Survival (pp. 81–104). Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA; London: University of California Press.
  42. Ross, A. A. G. (2006). Coming in from the Cold: Constructivism and Emotions. European Journal of International Relations, 12(2), 197–222. · DOI
  43. Shapiro, M. J. (2013). Studies in Trans-disciplinary Method: After the Aesthetic Turn. London and New York: Routledge.
  44. Solomon, T. (2015). Embodiment, Emotions and Materialism in International Relations. In L. Åhäll & T. Gregory (Eds.), Emotions, Politics and War (pp. 58–70). London and New York: Routledge.
  45. Spry, T. (2001). Performing Autoethnography: An Embodied Methodological Praxis. Qualitative Inquiry, 7(6), 706–732. · DOI
  46. Sylvester, C. (2011). The Forum: Emotion and the Feminist IR Researcher. International Studies Review, 13(4), 687–708. · DOI
  47. Sylvester, C. (2015). Art/Museums: International Relations Where We Least Expect It. Abingdon: Routledge. · DOI
  48. Thrift, N. (2008). Non-representational Theory: Space, Politics, Affect. London and New York: Routledge. · DOI
  49. Wakeman, S. (2014). Fieldwork, Biography and Emotion: Doing Criminological Autoethnography. British Journal of Criminology, 54(5), 705–721. · DOI
  50. Waterton, E., & Watson, S. (2014). The Semiotics of Heritage Tourism. Bristol and Buffalo: Channel View Publications. · DOI
  51. Weldes, J. (1999). Constructing National Interests: The United States and the Cuban Missile Crisis. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  52. Wetherell, M., Yates, S., & Taylor, S. (2001). Discourse Theory and Practice: A Reader. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  53. Yanow, D. (2014). How Built Spaces Mean? A Semiotics of Space. In Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn (pp. 368–386). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, Inc.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Reeves, A.
Venue
Researching Emotions in International Relations
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published
2017-12-06
Pages
103-127
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-65575-8_5
Cited by
25
References
3
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (unspecified)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review