An Empirical Analysis of Smart Contracts: Platforms, Applications, and Design Patterns
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
[90] presented Lition, a public blockchain that allows storage and deletion of private data.
“[90] presented Lition, a public blockchain that allows storage and deletion of private data.”
From Privacy-Preserving Solutions for Blockchain: Review and Challenges (2019) · cites this paper as [90]
Lition requires setting trusted knowledge groups of nodes to manage the blockchain, which need to commit to not store real data hashes and delete data upon user request without maintaining back-up copies.
“However, it requires setting trusted knowledge groups of nodes to manage the blockchain, that need to commit (e.g. through legal agreement) to not store real data hashes, and delete the data upon user request (without maintaining back-up copies).”
From Privacy-Preserving Solutions for Blockchain: Review and Challenges (2019) · cites this paper as [90]
Cites
A Survey of Attacks on Ethereum Smart Contracts (SoK)
Atzei, N., Bartoletti, M., & Cimoli, T. (2017) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-54455-6_8 · Cited by 1,553 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Smart contract applications within blockchain technology: a systematic mapping study
Macrinici, D., Cartofeanu, C., & Gao, S. (2018) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2018.10.004 · Cited by 458 · see citing works
Privacy-Preserving Solutions for Blockchain: Review and Challenges
Bernal Bernabe, J., Canovas, J. L., Hernandez-Ramos, J. L., Torres Moreno, R., & Skarmeta, A. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2950872 · Cited by 430 · see citing works
Sanka, A. I., Irfan, M., Huang, I., & Cheung, R. C. C. (2021) · Computer Communications · doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2020.12.028 · Cited by 265 · see citing works
Pandl, K. D., Thiebes, S., Schmidt-Kraepelin, M., & Sunyaev, A. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2981447 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Open Problems in Cooperative AI
Dafoe, A., Hughes, E., Bachrach, Y., Collins, T., McKee, K. R., Leibo, J. Z., Larson, K., & Graepel, T. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.08630 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bartoletti, M., & Pompianu, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Cagliari (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Bartoletti, Massimo
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2017
- Pages
- 494-509
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W2598801365
- Cited by
- 458
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 87 · 2019: 77 · 2018: 71 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 50.63
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- UNICA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Cagliari) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, programming, and type systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed systems and fault tolerance
- Keywords
- smart contracts, Bitcoin, Ethereum, distributed computing, programming patterns, financial applications, game applications, source code analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
