The practice of freedom: human rights and the Global Mental Health Agenda
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
It has been the focus of recent calls for a paradigm change in the field of global mental health, particularly in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.
“It has been the focus of recent calls for a paradigm change in the field of global mental health (106–108), particularly in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic (109).”
From Recovery from Severe Mental Health Problems: A Systematic Review of Service User and Informal Caregiver Perspectives (2021) · cites this paper as [106]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 62 · Cited by 45
- Authors
- Mezzina, R., Rosen, A., Amering, M., & Javed, A.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Medical University of Vienna (AT)
- Corresponding author
- Rosen, Alan
- Amering, Michaela
- Venue
- Advances in Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2018-07-07
- Pages
- 483-515
- OpenAlex
- W2817126958
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 26.84
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, Medicine and Society
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Keywords
- Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, mental health policy, deinstitutionalization, coercion in mental health care, involuntary treatment, community mental health services, recovery orientation, citizenship, social exclusion, social determinants of health, psychosocial disability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
