A Smart Contract for Boardroom Voting with Maximum Voter Privacy

Open access

McCorry, Patrick, Shahandashti, Siamak F., Hao, Feng·2017·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-70972-7_20

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-70972-7_20

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Bulletproofs: Short Proofs for Confidential Transactions and More
Bunz, B., Bootle, J., Boneh, D., Poelstra, A., Wuille, P., & Maxwell, G. (2018) · 2018 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) · doi:10.1109/sp.2018.00020 · Cited by 1,154
Ancile: Privacy-preserving framework for access control and interoperability of electronic health records using blockchain technology
Dagher, G. G., Mohler, J., Milojkovic, M., & Marella, P. B. (2018) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2018.02.014 · Cited by 854
Privacy-Preserving Solutions for Blockchain: Review and Challenges
Bernal Bernabe, J., Canovas, J. L., Hernandez-Ramos, J. L., Torres Moreno, R., & Skarmeta, A. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2950872 · Cited by 459
“A more comprehensive approach is proposed by [195] that implements a system on Ethereum in which each voter is in control of the privacy of their own vote, so that it can be only breached by a full collusion involving all other voters.”
Method
Secure cloud-based EHR system using attribute-based cryptosystem and blockchain
Wang, H., & Song, Y. (2018) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-018-0994-6 · Cited by 409
Blockchain 3.0 applications survey
Di Francesco Maesa, D., & Mori, P. (2020) · Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing · doi:10.1016/j.jpdc.2019.12.019 · Cited by 372
Security, Performance, and Applications of Smart Contracts: A Systematic Survey
Rouhani, S., & Deters, R. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2911031 · Cited by 309
A systematic literature review and meta-analysis on scalable blockchain-based electronic voting systems
Jafar, U., Ab Aziz, M. J., Shukur, Z., & Hussain, H. A. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22197585 · Cited by 59
Decentralized Privacy-preserving Timed Execution in Blockchain-based Smart Contract Platforms
Li, C., & Palanisamy, B. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1902.05613 · Cited by 27

Authors: McCorry, P., Shahandashti, S. F., & Hao, F.
Venue: Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Published: 2017
Pages: 357-375
ISSN: 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
1611-3349
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-70972-7_20
OpenAlex: W2592077777
Cited by: 506
References: 0
FWCI: 45.96
Type: conference paper
Language: en
Open access: green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review