CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 28Educational Games and GamificationInnovative Teaching MethodsEducational Technology and E-Learning

The Use of New Learning Technologies in Higher Education Classroom: A Case Study

Esteves, Micaela, Pereira, Angela, Veiga, Nuno, Vasco, Rui, Veiga, Anabela·2018·Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-73210-7_59
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-73210-7_59

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Esteves, M., Pereira, A., Veiga, N., Vasco, R., & Veiga, A.
Affiliations
Universidade de Leiria e Oeste (PT)
Corresponding author
Esteves, Micaela
ORCID
Venue
Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published
2017-12-27
Pages
499-506
ISSN
  • 2194-5357 (ISSN-L)
  • 2194-5365
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-73210-7_59
OpenAlex
W2779602092
Cited by
28
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
11.23
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (unspecified)
Locations
  • Advances in intelligent systems and computing (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Games and Gamification
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and E-Learning
Keywords
game-based learning, Kahoot, educational technology, student motivation, student participation, active learning, undergraduate students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review