CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 23Educational Games and GamificationInnovative Teaching MethodsEducational Methods and Outcomes

Assessing the Learning Process Playing with Kahoot – A Study with Upper Secondary School Pupils Learning Electrical Circuits

Tsihouridis, Charilaos, Vavougios, Dennis, Ioannidis, George S.·2018·Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-73210-7_70
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-73210-7_70

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tsihouridis, C., Vavougios, D., & Ioannidis, G. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Thessaly (GR)
  • University of Patras (GR)
Corresponding author
Ioannidis, George S.
ORCID
Tsihouridis, Charilaos
Venue
Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published
2017-12-27
Pages
602-612
ISSN
  • 2194-5357 (ISSN-L)
  • 2194-5365
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-73210-7_70
OpenAlex
W2777804538
Cited by
23
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
6.04
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (unspecified)
Locations
  • Advances in intelligent systems and computing (publishedVersion)
  • University of Thessaly Institutional Repository (University of Thessaly) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Games and Gamification
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Methods and Outcomes
Keywords
Kahoot, game-based learning, electrical circuits, physics education, high school students, formative assessment, student motivation, active learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review