Inclusion in the Third Wave: Access to Experience
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Although the extension of conformance-based methodologies is not a new demand, only few tools and techniques have been established for capturing and understanding the digital experiences of users with disabilities.
“Although the extension of conformance-based methodologies is not a new demand, only few tools and techniques have been established for capturing and understanding the digital experiences of users with disabilities (Power et al., 2018).”
From How compliance with web accessibility standards shapes the experiences of users with and without disabilities (2023) · cites this paper as Power et al., 2018
Cites
Guidelines are only half of the story: accessibility problems encountered by blind users on the web
Power, C., Freire, A., Petrie, H., & Swallow, D. (2012) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2207676.2207736 · Cited by 327 · see citing works
Self-citationNonvisual presentation of graphical user interfaces: contrasting two approaches
Mynatt, E. D., & Weber, G. (1994) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/191666.191732 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Visualization tools for blind people using multiple modalities
Brewster, S. (2002) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638280110111388 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Vollenwyder, B., Petralito, S., Iten, G. H., Brühlmann, F., Opwis, K., & Mekler, E. D. (2023) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2022.102956 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
- Authors
- Power, C., Cairns, P., & Barlet, M.
- Affiliations
- Kyverna Therapeutics, Inc. (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Power, Christopher
- Venue
- Human–Computer Interaction Series
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2018
- Pages
- 163-181
- ISSN
- 1571-5035 (ISSN-L)
- 2524-4477
- OpenAlex
- W2810729758
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 5.56
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Human-computer interaction series (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
- Keywords
- inclusive design, people with disabilities, accessibility, implementation lag, user experience design, web accessibility, video games, technology adoption, pluralistic approach, lived experience, customization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
