Dialogue Intent Classification with Long Short-Term Memory Networks
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Memory-augmented networks have not fully addressed the need for a reliable and adaptable long-term memory function in LLMs.
“Despite showing potential, these methods have not fully addressed the need for a reliable and adaptable long-term memory function in LLMs.”
From MemoryBank: Enhancing Large Language Models with Long-Term Memory (2023) · cites this paper as Meng & Huang, 2018
Cites
Austin, J. L. (1975) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001 · Cited by 21,496 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
MemoryBank: Enhancing Large Language Models with Long-Term Memory
Zhong, W., Guo, L., Gao, Q., Ye, H., & Wang, Y. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.10250 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
- Authors
- Meng, L., & Huang, M.
- Affiliations
- State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Technology and Systems (CN)
- ORCID
- Huang, Minlie
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2018
- Pages
- 42-50
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W2782096898
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 1.84
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Keywords
- long short-term memory networks, hierarchical LSTM, memory modules, context modeling, dialogue systems, conversational datasets, e-commerce customer service
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review