Cited by 32Speech and dialogue systemsAI in Service InteractionsTopic Modeling

Dialogue Intent Classification with Long Short-Term Memory Networks

Meng, Lian, Huang, Minlie·2018·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-73618-1_4

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Memory-augmented networks have not fully addressed the need for a reliable and adaptable long-term memory function in LLMs.

    “Despite showing potential, these methods have not fully addressed the need for a reliable and adaptable long-term memory function in LLMs.”

    From MemoryBank: Enhancing Large Language Models with Long-Term Memory (2023) · cites this paper as Meng & Huang, 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meng, L., & Huang, M.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Technology and Systems (CN)
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2018
Pages
42-50
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W2782096898
Cited by
32
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.84
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
Keywords
long short-term memory networks, hierarchical LSTM, memory modules, context modeling, dialogue systems, conversational datasets, e-commerce customer service

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review