The Neglected Problem of the Neurofeedback Learning (In)Ability
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Targeted EEG-learning assessments are important in neurofeedback (NFB) trials.
“the importance targeted EEG-learning assessments in NFB trials has been emphasized by researchers [120–126]”
Cites
Arns, M., de Ridder, S., Strehl, U., Breteler, M., & Coenen, A. (2009) · Clinical EEG and Neuroscience · doi:10.1177/155005940904000311 · Cited by 794 · see citing works
Learning to modulate one’s own brain activity: The effect of spontaneous mental strategies
Kober, S. E., Witte, M., Ninaus, M., Neuper, C., & Wood, G. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00695 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Micoulaud-Franchi, J.-A., Geoffroy, P. A., Fond, G., Lopez, R., Bioulac, S., & Philip, P. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00906 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Resting state functional connectivity predicts neurofeedback response
Scheinost, D., Stoica, T., Wasylink, S., Gruner, P., Saksa, J., Pittenger, C., & Hampson, M. (2014) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00338 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder—The Neurofeedback Remedy
Othmer, S., & Othmer, S. F. (2009) · Biofeedback · doi:10.5298/1081-5937-37.1.24 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Perez, T. M., Glue, P., Adhia, D. B., Navid, M. S., Zeng, J., Dillingham, P., Smith, M., Niazi, I. K., Young, C. K., & De Ridder, D. (2022) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-022-06863-z · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Szewczyk, R. Ł., Ratomska, M., & Jaśkiewicz, M.
- Affiliations
- Uniwersytet SWPS (PL)
- John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin (PL)
- Corresponding author
- Szewczyk, Rafał Łukasz
- Venue
- Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2018
- Pages
- 45-58
- ISSN
- 2194-5357 (ISSN-L)
- 2194-5365
- OpenAlex
- W2791251029
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 1.72
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Advances in intelligent systems and computing (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Keywords
- neurofeedback, BCI illiteracy, biofeedback, brain-computer interface
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
