CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 7

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Median Problem Pressure and Policy Learning: An Exploratory Analysis of European Countries

Trein, Philipp·2018·International Series on Public Policy
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-76210-4_11
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-76210-4_11

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. Bonoli, G. (2000). The politics of pension reform: Institutions and policy change in Western Europe. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. · DOI
  2. Bonoli, G. (2010). The political economy of active labor-market policy. Politics and Society, 38(4), 435–457. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bonoli, G. (2012). Blame avoidance and credit claiming revisited. In G. Bonoli & D. Natale (Eds.), The politics of the new welfare state (pp. 93–110). Oxford: Oxford University Press. · DOI
  4. Bonoli, G., & Trein, P. (2015). Best practice report on policy learning infrastructures in innovative labour market policies. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2707353. Social Science Research Network, last accessed 2 November 2017.
  5. Boswell, C. (2008). The political functions of expert knowledge: Knowledge and legitimation in European Union immigration policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 15(4), 471–488. · DOI
  6. Braun, D., & Gilardi, F. (2006). Taking ‘Galton’s problem’ seriously: Towards a theory of policy diffusion. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 18(3), 298–322. · DOI
  7. Champion, C. (2013). Organisational reforms in active welfare states: A comparative analysis of the turn to ‘single gateways’ in Western Europe. (PhD thesis, University of Lausanne, Lausanne).
  8. Cox, R. H., & Béland, D. (2013). Valence, policy ideas, and the rise of sustainability. Governance, 26(2), 307–328. · DOI
  9. Culpepper, P. D. (2002). Powering, puzzling, and ‘pacting’: The informational logic of negotiated reforms. Journal of European Public Policy, 9(5), 774–790. · DOI
  10. Culpepper, P. D. (2010). Quiet politics and business power: Corporate control in Europe and Japan. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. · DOI
  11. Daviter, F. (2015). The political use of knowledge in the policy process. Policy Sciences, 48(4), 491–505. · DOI
  12. DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. W. (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  13. Dunlop, C. A. (2014). The possible experts: How epistemic communities negotiate barriers to knowledge use in ecosystems services policy. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 32(2), 208–228. · DOI
  14. Dunlop, C. A. (2017). Pathologies of policy learning: What are they and how do they contribute to policy failure? Policy and Politics, 45(1), 19–37. · DOI
  15. Dunlop, C. A., & Radaelli, C. M. (2013). Systematizing policy learning: From monoliths to dimensions. Political Studies, 61(3), 599–619. · DOI
  16. Easton, D. (1957). An approach to the analysis of political systems. World Politics, 9(3), 383–400. · DOI
  17. Fleckenstein, T. (2011). Institutions, ideas and learning in welfare state change: Labour market reforms in Germany. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. · DOI
  18. George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  19. Gilardi, F. (2010). Who learns from what in policy diffusion processes? American Journal of Political Science, 54(3), 650–666. · DOI
  20. Hall, C. M. (2011). Policy learning and policy failure in sustainable tourism governance: From first- and second-order to third-order change? Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 19(4–5), 649–671. · DOI
  21. Hall, P. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state. The case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 3(25), 275–296. · DOI · Paper page
  22. Heclo, H. (1974). Modern social policy in Britain and Sweden: From relief to income maintenance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  23. Holzinger, K., Knill, C., & Sommerer, T. (2008). Environmental policy convergence: The impact of international harmonization, transnational communication, and regulatory competition. International Organization, 62(04), 553–587. · DOI
  24. Hood, C. (2010). The blame game: Spin, bureaucracy, and self-preservation in government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. · DOI
  25. Hoppe, R. (2011). The governance of problems: Puzzling, powering and participation. Bristol: Policy Press. · DOI · Paper page
  26. Howlett, M. (2012). The lessons of failure: Learning and blame avoidance in public policy-making. International Political Science Review, 33(5), 539–555. · DOI
  27. Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Harper and Collins.
  28. Martin, S., & Sanderson, I. (1999). Evaluating public policy experiments measuring outcomes, monitoring processes or managing pilots? Evaluation, 5(3), 245–258. · DOI
  29. May, P. J. (1992). Policy learning and failure. Journal of Public Policy, 12(4), 331–354. · DOI
  30. Natali, D. (2002). La Ridefinizione del Welfare State Contemporaneo: La Riforma delle Pensioni in Francia e in Italia. Florence: European University Institute.
  31. Oreskes, N., & Conway, E. M. (2010). Merchants of doubt: How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issue from tobacco smoke to global warming. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Press.
  32. Pierson, P. (1994). Dismantling the welfare state: Reagan, Thatcher, and the politics of retrenchment in Britain and the United States. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. · DOI
  33. Radaelli, C. M. (1995). The role of knowledge in the policy process. Journal of European Public Policy, 2(2), 159–183. · DOI
  34. Radaelli, C. M. (1999). The public policy of the European Union: Whither politics of expertise? Journal of European Public Policy, 6(5), 757–774. · DOI
  35. Radaelli, C. M. (2009). Measuring policy learning: Regulatory impact assessment in Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(8), 1145–1164. · DOI
  36. Sabatier, P. A. (1988). An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences, 21(2–3), 129–168. · DOI
  37. Schulze, I., & Moran, M. (2006). United Kingdom: Pension politics in an adversarial system. In E. Immergut, K. M. Anderson, & I. Schulze (Eds.), Handbook of West European pension politics (pp. 49–96). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  38. Schwartz, H. (2001). Round up the usual suspects!: Globalization, domestic politics, and welfare state change. In P. Pierson (Ed.), The new politics of the welfare state (pp. 17–44). Oxford: Oxford University Press. · DOI
  39. Starke, P. (2006). The politics of welfare state retrenchment: A literature review. Social Policy and Administration, 40(1), 104–120. · DOI
  40. Weible, C. M. (2008). Expert-based information and policy subsystems: A review and synthesis. Policy Studies Journal, 36(4), 615–635. · DOI
  41. Weiss, C. H. (1980). Knowledge creep and decision accretion. Science Communication, 1(3), 381–404.
  42. Weiss, C. H. (1982). Policy research in the context of diffuse decision making. The Journal of Higher Education, 53(6), 619–639. · DOI
  43. Weiss, C. H. (1986). The circuitry of enlightenment diffusion of social science research to policymakers. Science Communication, 8(2), 274–281.
  44. Weiss, C. H. (1993). Where politics and evaluation research meet. Evaluation Practice, 14(1), 93–106. · DOI
  45. Wildavsky, A. (1979). Speaking truth to power. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
  46. Yom, S. (2015). From methodology to practice: Inductive iteration in comparative research. Comparative Political Studies, 48(5), 616–644. · DOI
  47. Zeitlin, J., Pochet, P., & Magnusson, L. (Eds.). (2005). The open method of coordination in action: The European employment and social inclusion strategies. Bruxelles, Bern, Berlin, Frankfurt am Main, New York, Oxford, and Wien: SALTSA.
  48. Zito, A. R., & Schout, A. (2009). Learning theory reconsidered: EU integration theories and learning. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(8), 1103–1123. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Trein, P.
Venue
International Series on Public Policy
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published
2018
Pages
243-266
ISSN
  • 2524-7301
  • 2524-731X
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-76210-4_11
Cited by
7
References
3
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (unspecified)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review