CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 7

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Learning from Practical Experience: Implementation Epistemic Communities in the European Union

Polman, Daniel·2018·International Series on Public Policy
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-76210-4_6
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-76210-4_6

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Alons, G., & Zwaan, P. (2016). New wine in different bottles: Negotiating and selling the CAP post-2013 reform. Sociologia Ruralis, 56(3), 349–370. · DOI
  2. Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (2015). Politics of information: Problem definition and the course of public policy in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  3. Beyers, J., Donas, T., & Fraussen, B. (2015). No place like home? Explaining venue selection of regional offices in Brussels. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(5), 589–608. · DOI
  4. Bouwen, P. (2004). Exchanging access goods for access: A comparative study of business lobbying in the European Union institutions. European Journal of Political Research, 43(3), 337–369. · DOI
  5. Broscheid, A., & Coen, D. (2007). Lobbying activity and fora creation in the EU: Empirically exploring the nature of the policy good. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(3), 346–365. · DOI
  6. Chalmers, A. W. (2014). Getting a seat at the table: Caption, capture and expert groups in the European Union. West European Politics, 37(5), 976–992. · DOI
  7. Davis Cross, M. K. (2013). Rethinking epistemic communities twenty years later. Review of International Studies, 39(1), 137–160. · DOI
  8. Dunlop, C. A. (2007). Principal-agent modelling and learning. The European Commission, experts and agricultural hormone growth promoters. Public Policy and Administration, 22(4), 403–422. · DOI
  9. Dunlop, C. A. (2009). Policy transfer as learning: Capturing variation in what decision-makers learn from epistemic communities. Policy Studies, 30(3), 289–311. · DOI
  10. Dunlop, C. A. (2013). Epistemic Communities. In E. Araral, S. Fritzen, M. Howlett, M. Ramesh, & X. Wu (Eds.), Routledge handbook of public policy (pp. 229–443). Abingdon: Routledge.
  11. Dunlop, C. A. (2017). The irony of epistemic learning: Epistemic communities, policy learning and the case of Europe’s hormones saga. Policy and Society, 36(2), 215–232. · DOI
  12. Dunlop, C. A., & Radaelli, C. M. (2013). Systematising policy learning: From monolith to dimensions. Political Studies, 61(3), 599–619. · DOI
  13. Etheridge, L. S., & Short, J. (1983). Thinking about government learning. Journal of Management Studies, 20(1), 41–58. · DOI
  14. European Commission. (2015). Conclusions and recommendations of the workshop on improving the influence of the EMFF through cooperation. https://ec.europa.eu/fisheries/sites/fisheries/files/docs/body/20151109-conclusions_en.pdf. Accessed 1 November 2017.
  15. Haas, P. M. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1–35. · DOI
  16. Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275–296. · DOI · Paper page
  17. Hay, C. (2002). Political analysis: A critical introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave. · DOI
  18. Hay, C., & Wincott, D. (1998). Structure, agency and historical institutionalism. Political Studies, 46(5), 951–957. · DOI
  19. Heclo, H. (1974). Modern social politics in Britain and Sweden. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  20. Henning, H. C. A. (2009). Networks and power in the CAP system of the EU-15 and EU-27. Journal of Public Policy, 29(2), 153–177. · DOI
  21. Littoz-Monnet, A. (2014). The role of independent regulators in policy making: Venue-shopping and framing strategies in the EU regulation of old wives cures. European Journal of Political Research, 53(1), 1–17. · DOI
  22. Maggetti, M. (2009). The role of independent regulatory agencies in policy-making: A comparative analysis. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(3), 450–470. · DOI
  23. Peterson, J. (1995). Decision-making in the European Union: Towards a framework for analysis. Journal of European Public Policy, 2(1), 69–93. · DOI
  24. Peterson, J., & Bomberg, E. (1999). Decision-making in the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave. · DOI
  25. Pralle, S. B. (2003). Venue shopping, political strategy, and policy change: The internationalization of Canadian forest advocacy. Journal of Public Policy, 23(3), 233–260. · DOI
  26. Raustiala, K. (1997). Domestic institutions and international regulatory cooperation: Comparative responses to the convention on biological diversity. World Politics, 49(4), 482–509. · DOI
  27. Sager, F., Bürki, M., & Luginbühl, J. (2014). Can a policy program influence policy change? The case of the Swiss EnergieSchweiz program. Energy Policy, 74, 352–365. · DOI
  28. Verschuere, B. (2009). The role of public agencies in the policy making process: Rhetoric versus reality. Public Policy and Administration, 24(1), 23–46. · DOI
  29. Weiss, C. H., Murphy-Graham, E., & Birkeland, S. (2005). An alternate route to policy influence: How evaluations affect D.A.R.E. American Journal of Evaluation, 26(1), 12–30. · DOI
  30. Yin, R. K. (2012). Applications of case study research (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
  31. Young, A. R. (2010). The European policy process in comparative perspective. In H. Wallace, M. A. Pollack, & A. R. Young (Eds.), Policy-making in the European Union (6th ed., pp. 45–68). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  32. Zito, A. R. (2001). Epistemic communities, collective entrepreneurship and European integration. Journal of European Public Policy, 8(4), 585–603. · DOI
  33. Zwaan, P. (2012). Struggling with Europe: How initiators of horizontal forms of governance respond to EU formal rules. PhD thesis, Wageningen University.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Polman, D.
Venue
International Series on Public Policy
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published
2018
Pages
123-144
ISSN
  • 2524-7301
  • 2524-731X
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-76210-4_6
Cited by
7
References
1
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (unspecified)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review