Cited by 7Social Media and PoliticsComplex Network Analysis TechniquesMisinformation and Its Impacts

Analyzing Political Information Network of the U.S. Partisan Public on Twitter

Chong, Miyoung·2018·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-78105-1_50

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Basic homophilous tendencies are very easy to find on most social media platforms.

    “On most social media platforms, basic homophilous tendencies are indeed very easy to find:”

    From Filter bubble (2019) · cites this paper as Chong, 2018

  • Twitter hashtags such as #MAGA or #resist attract highly homophilous and diametrically opposed participant groups.

    “it is unsurprising that Twitter hashtags such as #MAGA or #resist attract highly homophilous and diametrically opposed participant groups, for instance (Chong, 2018);”

    From Filter bubble (2019) · cites this paper as Chong, 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Filter bubble

    Bruns, A. (2019) · Internet Policy Review · doi:10.14763/2019.4.1426 · Cited by 193 · see citing works

    “…unsurprising that Twitter hashtags such as #MAGA or #resist attract highly homophilous and diametrically opposed participant groups, for instance (Chong, 2018); similarly, it is to be expected that Facebook pages and groups with an explicit anti-vaccination agenda will mainly attract…”
    Background

Authors
Chong, M.
Affiliations
University of North Texas (US)
Corresponding author
Chong, Miyoung
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2018
Pages
453-463
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W2792012359
Cited by
7
References
1
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3
FWCI
4.83
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
Keywords
Twitter, hashtags, homophily, political communication, opinion leaders, betweenness centrality, electronic word of mouth, online political discourse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review