Analyzing Political Information Network of the U.S. Partisan Public on Twitter
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Basic homophilous tendencies are very easy to find on most social media platforms.
“On most social media platforms, basic homophilous tendencies are indeed very easy to find:”
From Filter bubble (2019) · cites this paper as Chong, 2018
Twitter hashtags such as #MAGA or #resist attract highly homophilous and diametrically opposed participant groups.
“it is unsurprising that Twitter hashtags such as #MAGA or #resist attract highly homophilous and diametrically opposed participant groups, for instance (Chong, 2018);”
From Filter bubble (2019) · cites this paper as Chong, 2018
Cites
The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere
(2006) · Habermas · doi:10.4324/9780203020166-5 · Cited by 4,779 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bruns, A. (2019) · Internet Policy Review · doi:10.14763/2019.4.1426 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
“…unsurprising that Twitter hashtags such as #MAGA or #resist attract highly homophilous and diametrically opposed participant groups, for instance (Chong, 2018); similarly, it is to be expected that Facebook pages and groups with an explicit anti-vaccination agenda will mainly attract…”
Background
- Authors
- Chong, M.
- Affiliations
- University of North Texas (US)
- Corresponding author
- Chong, Miyoung
- ORCID
- Chong, Miyoung
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2018
- Pages
- 453-463
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W2792012359
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 4.83
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Keywords
- Twitter, hashtags, homophily, political communication, opinion leaders, betweenness centrality, electronic word of mouth, online political discourse
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review