Cited by 3Digital Games and MediaSports, Gender, and SocietyGender and Feminist Studies

He Scores Through a Screen: Mediating Masculinities Through Hockey Video Games

Ouellette, Marc, Conway, Steven·2018·Masculinities in Play

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-90581-5_7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Video games have changed the way sports are viewed and played.

    “we already know that video games have changed the way sports are viewed and played (Ouellette and Conway 2018).”

    From The Game Studies Crisis: What Are the Rules of Play? (2021) · cites this paper as Ouellette and Conway 2018

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ouellette, M., & Conway, S.
Affiliations
  • Old Dominion University (US)
  • Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
Venue
Masculinities in Play
Published
2018
Pages
109-126
OpenAlex
W2895495367
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
4.19
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University) (submittedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Games and Media
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sports, Gender, and Society
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
Keywords
masculinity, player statistics, embodiment, game studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review