Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 13Mathematical Approximation and IntegrationMathematical functions and polynomialsMarkov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Trio Identity for Quasi-Monte Carlo Error

Open access
Hickernell, Fred J.·2018·Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics

Abstract

Monte Carlo methods approximate integrals by sample averages of integrand values. The error of Monte Carlo methods may be expressed as a trio identity: the product of the variation of the integrand, the discrepancy of the sampling measure, and the confounding. The trio identity has different versions, depending on whether the integrand is deterministic or Bayesian and whether the sampling measure is deterministic or random. Although the variation and the discrepancy are common in the literature, the confounding is relatively unknown and under-appreciated. Theory and examples are used to show how the cubature error may be reduced by employing the low discrepancy sampling that defines quasi-Monte Carlo methods. The error may also be reduced by rewriting the integral in terms of a different integrand. Finally, the confounding explains why the cubature error might decay at a rate different from that of the discrepancy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-91436-7_1

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Giles, M.: Multilevel Monte Carlo methods. In: Dick, J., Kuo, F.Y., Peters, G.W., Sloan, I.H. (eds.) Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods 2012. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics, vol. 65. Springer, Berlin (2013)
  2. Jiang, L.: Guaranteed adaptive Monte Carlo methods for estimating means of random variables. Ph.D. thesis, Illinois Institute of Technology (2016)
  3. Novak, E., Woźniakowski, H.: Tractability of Multivariate Problems Volume II: Standard Information for Functionals. EMS Tracts in Mathematics, vol. 12. European Mathematical Society, Zürich (2010) · DOI
  4. Novak, E., Woźniakowski, H.: Tractability of Multivariate Problems: Volume III: Standard Information for Operators. EMS Tracts in Mathematics, vol. 18. European Mathematical Society, Zürich (2012) · DOI
  5. Rasmussen, C.E., Ghahramani, Z.: Bayesian Monte Carlo. In: Thrun, S., Saul, L.K., Obermayer, K. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 15, pp. 489–496. MIT Press, Cambridge (2003)

Cited by

See all 13

Metadata

Authors
Hickernell, F. J.
Affiliations
Illinois Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Hickernell, Fred J.
Venue
Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics
Published
2018
Pages
3-27
ISSN
  • 2194-1009 (ISSN-L)
  • 2194-1017
OpenAlex
W2749558669
Cited by
9
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.00
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Springer proceedings in mathematics & statistics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1522687)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Numerical Analysis › Mathematical Approximation and Integration
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematical functions and polynomials
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods
Keywords
quasi-Monte Carlo, discrepancy, confounding, low-discrepancy sampling, Bayesian integration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.