Gambler’s Fallacy and Hot Hand Fallacy
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Over-alternation bias leads us to believe that if something has just occurred, it is less likely to occur again.
“For instance, the over-alternation bias leads us to believe that if something has just occurred, it is less likely to occur again [25 , 26] .”
From Enhancing human-AI collaboration: The case of colonoscopy (2024) · cites this paper as [25]
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Enhancing human-AI collaboration: The case of colonoscopy
Introzzi, L., Zonca, J., Cabitza, F., Cherubini, P., & Reverberi, C. (2024) · Digestive and Liver Disease · doi:10.1016/j.dld.2023.10.018 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
- Authors
- Howard, J.
- Affiliations
- NYU Langone Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Howard, Jonathan
- ORCID
- Howard, Jonathan
- Venue
- Cognitive Errors and Diagnostic Mistakes
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2018-11-29
- Pages
- 203-210
- OpenAlex
- W2902493703
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 0.82
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Autoimmune Neurological Disorders and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Keywords
- limbic encephalitis, autoimmune encephalitis, temporal lobe abnormalities, psychosis, paranoia, seizures, psychiatric symptoms, temporal lobe epilepsy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
