Towards a PROV Ontology for Simulation Models
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Ruscheinski et al. (2018) applied PROV-DM for capturing provenance information from entire simulation studies and initiated a definition of a PROV-DM ontology for these studies.
“Recently, Ruscheinski et al. (2018) [20] have applied PROV-DM for capturing provenance information from entire simulation studies and initiated a definition of a PROV-DM ontology for these studies.”
From Relating simulation studies by provenance—Developing a family of Wnt signaling models (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
Important ingredients of the Ruscheinski et al. ontology are specific types of entities, specific roles between these entities, specific refinement of activities, and specific inference strategies.
“Important ingredients of this ontology have been identified to be “a) specific types of entities (e.g., data, theories, simulation experiments, and simulation models), b) specific roles between these entities (e.g., used as input, used for calibration, used for validation, used for adaptation, used for extension, used for composition), c) specific refinement of activities (i.e., successive refinem”
From Relating simulation studies by provenance—Developing a family of Wnt signaling models (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
The authors revised and refined the specialization of PROV-DM introduced by Ruscheinski et al. (2018).
“We have revised and refined the specialization of PROV-DM, which was introduced by Ruscheinski et al. (2018) [20].”
From Relating simulation studies by provenance—Developing a family of Wnt signaling models (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
Each entity and activity in the final set has already been mentioned for provenance, modeling or documentation purposes, or experiment design of simulation studies, but they have not all been used together.
“Each entity and activity has already been mentioned for provenance, modeling or documentation purposes, or experiment design of simulation studies [1, 3–5, 8, 20, 21, 60–63], but they have not all been used together.”
From Relating simulation studies by provenance—Developing a family of Wnt signaling models (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
The specialization builds on an earlier PROV-DM specialization in which Simulation Model, Simulation Experiment, Simulation Data, and Wet-lab Data were identified as crucial entities of simulation studies.
“It builds on an earlier PROV-DM specialization in which Simulation Model, Simulation Experiment, Simulation Data, and Wet-lab Data have been identified as crucial entities of simulation studies [20].”
From Relating simulation studies by provenance—Developing a family of Wnt signaling models (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 8 · Cited by 13
- Authors
- Ruscheinski, A., Gjorgevikj, D., Dombrowsky, M., Budde, K., & Uhrmacher, A. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Rostock (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Ruscheinski, Andreas
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2018
- Pages
- 192-195
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W2889978278
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 2.41
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Semantic Web and Ontologies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Simulation Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- computer simulation, simulation study, simulation experiments, model generation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review