Cited by 13Scientific Computing and Data ManagementSemantic Web and OntologiesSimulation Techniques and Applications

Towards a PROV Ontology for Simulation Models

Ruscheinski, Andreas, Gjorgevikj, Dragana, Dombrowsky, Marcus, Budde, Kai, Uhrmacher, Adelinde M.·2018·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-98379-0_17

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ruscheinski et al. (2018) applied PROV-DM for capturing provenance information from entire simulation studies and initiated a definition of a PROV-DM ontology for these studies.

    “Recently, Ruscheinski et al. (2018) [20] have applied PROV-DM for capturing provenance information from entire simulation studies and initiated a definition of a PROV-DM ontology for these studies.”
  • Important ingredients of the Ruscheinski et al. ontology are specific types of entities, specific roles between these entities, specific refinement of activities, and specific inference strategies.

    “Important ingredients of this ontology have been identified to be “a) specific types of entities (e.g., data, theories, simulation experiments, and simulation models), b) specific roles between these entities (e.g., used as input, used for calibration, used for validation, used for adaptation, used for extension, used for composition), c) specific refinement of activities (i.e., successive refinem”
  • The authors revised and refined the specialization of PROV-DM introduced by Ruscheinski et al. (2018).

    “We have revised and refined the specialization of PROV-DM, which was introduced by Ruscheinski et al. (2018) [20].”
  • Each entity and activity in the final set has already been mentioned for provenance, modeling or documentation purposes, or experiment design of simulation studies, but they have not all been used together.

    “Each entity and activity has already been mentioned for provenance, modeling or documentation purposes, or experiment design of simulation studies [1, 3–5, 8, 20, 21, 60–63], but they have not all been used together.”
  • The specialization builds on an earlier PROV-DM specialization in which Simulation Model, Simulation Experiment, Simulation Data, and Wet-lab Data were identified as crucial entities of simulation studies.

    “It builds on an earlier PROV-DM specialization in which Simulation Model, Simulation Experiment, Simulation Data, and Wet-lab Data have been identified as crucial entities of simulation studies [20].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 8 · Cited by 13

Authors
Ruscheinski, A., Gjorgevikj, D., Dombrowsky, M., Budde, K., & Uhrmacher, A. M.
Affiliations
University of Rostock (DE)
Corresponding author
Ruscheinski, Andreas
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2018
Pages
192-195
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W2889978278
Cited by
13
References
8
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.41
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Simulation Techniques and Applications
Keywords
computer simulation, simulation study, simulation experiments, model generation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review