ProjR: Embedding Structure Diversity for Knowledge Graph Completion
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ProjR can model N-1, N-N, 1-N-1 and one-relation circle structures with the advantage of a combination operator design.
“It can model N-1, N-N, 1-N-1 and one-relation circle structures with the advantage of a combination operator design.”
From A Survey on Knowledge Graph Embeddings for Link Prediction (2021) · cites this paper as [178]
Cites
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Survey on Knowledge Graph Embeddings for Link Prediction
Wang, M., Qiu, L., & Wang, X. (2021) · Symmetry · doi:10.3390/sym13030485 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zhang, W., Li, J., & Chen, H.
- Affiliations
- Zhejiang University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Chen, Huajun
- ORCID
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2018
- Pages
- 145-157
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W2886448622
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 0.20
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
- Keywords
- knowledge graph completion, knowledge graph embedding, structural diversity, TransR, link prediction, entity representation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review