Cited by 2Advanced Graph Neural NetworksTopic ModelingRecommender Systems and Techniques

ProjR: Embedding Structure Diversity for Knowledge Graph Completion

Zhang, Wen, Li, Juan, Chen, Huajun·2018·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-99495-6_13

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ProjR can model N-1, N-N, 1-N-1 and one-relation circle structures with the advantage of a combination operator design.

    “It can model N-1, N-N, 1-N-1 and one-relation circle structures with the advantage of a combination operator design.”

    From A Survey on Knowledge Graph Embeddings for Link Prediction (2021) · cites this paper as [178]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, W., Li, J., & Chen, H.
Affiliations
Zhejiang University (CN)
Corresponding author
Chen, Huajun
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2018
Pages
145-157
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W2886448622
Cited by
2
References
1
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.20
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
Keywords
knowledge graph completion, knowledge graph embedding, structural diversity, TransR, link prediction, entity representation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review