New Models of Learning for New Media: Observations of Young People Learning Digital Design
Abstract
There are numerous discourses that seek to define the relationships between young people and digital media. These discourses have different and sometimes contradictory ways of constructing learners and the learning environment (Facer et al. 2001). On the one hand there are panics around new media which position children and young people as being at risk from the dangers of digital technology. In this view children are in need of careful teaching and controlling, as they are unable to learn the correct and safe way to use digital technology on their own. In complete contrast, there are discourses around new technologies which position children as ready learners and technology as offering endless easy-to-use resources for worthwhile learning. This latter view of children as „natural cyberkids’ overlooks many aspects of learning and digital technology, not least the socio-cultural aspects of learning or the possibility that there might be a developmental progression of skills related to learning new technologies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Willett's workshop, it was difficult to ensure all children learn in the sequenced steps that the task may require, particularly when learning complex professional software, and difficult to ensure teacher support is available just when the child is ready to advance.
“As she notes, it was difficult in practice to ensure all children learn in the sequenced steps that the task may require, particularly if learning to use complex professional software; similarly it is difficult to ensure that teacher support is available just when the child is ready to advance his or her understanding”
From Critical reflections on the benefits of ICT in education (2012) · cites this paper as Willett (2005)
Cites
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 33,219 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Critical reflections on the benefits of ICT in education
Livingstone, S. (2012) · Oxford Review of Education · doi:10.1080/03054985.2011.577938 · Cited by 771 · see citing works
- Authors
- Willett, R.
- Corresponding author
- Willett, Rebekah
- ORCID
- Willett, Rebekah
- Venue
- Jahrbuch Medien-Pädagogik 4
- Publisher
- VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften
- Published
- 2005
- Pages
- 127-144
- OpenAlex
- W2804538908
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- de
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literacy, Media, and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital Education and Society
- Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
- Keywords
- new media, youth, learning models, sociocultural learning, digital literacy, skill development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review