Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414 · see citing works
The Content Analysis Guidebook
Neuendorf, K. A. (2017) · doi:10.4135/9781071802878 · Cited by 9,286 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tausch, A. P., & Menold, N. (2016) · Global Qualitative Nursing Research · doi:10.1177/2333393616630466 · Cited by 287 · see citing works
Bartz, J. (2020) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci10090223 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Darius, P. (2022) · Social Network Analysis and Mining · doi:10.1007/s13278-022-00958-w · Cited by 22 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mayring, P., & Fenzl, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Klagenfurt (AT)
- Corresponding author
- Mayring, Philipp
- Venue
- Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung
- Publisher
- Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
- Published
- 2014
- Pages
- 543-556
- OpenAlex
- W4247971032
- Cited by
- 1,262
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 51 · 2025: 91 · 2024: 125 · 2023: 251 · 2022: 237 · 2021: 159 · 2020: 98 · 2019: 74 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 82.38
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- de
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Sociology and Education Studies
- Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
- Keywords
- qualitative content analysis, text analysis, interview transcripts, newspaper articles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
