The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Weak Hypotheses and Boosting for Generic Object Detection and Recognition
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting
Freund, Y., & Schapire, R. E. (1997) · Journal of Computer and System Sciences · doi:10.1006/jcss.1997.1504 · Cited by 20,466
Object recognition from local scale-invariant features
Lowe, D. G. (1999) · Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.1999.790410 · Cited by 16,472
A Combined Corner and Edge Detector
Harris, C., & Stephens, M. (1988) · Procedings of the Alvey Vision Conference 1988 · doi:10.5244/c.2.23 · Cited by 12,901
A performance evaluation of local descriptors
Mikolajczyk, K., & Schmid, C. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2005.188 · Cited by 6,723
Feature detection with automatic scale selection
Lindeberg, T. (1998) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/a:1008045108935 · Cited by 2,541
Cited by
Beyond Bags of Features: Spatial Pyramid Matching for Recognizing Natural Scene Categories
Lazebnik, S., Schmid, C., & Ponce, J. (2006) · 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition - Volume 2 (CVPR'06) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2006.68 · Cited by 7,916
A performance evaluation of local descriptors
Mikolajczyk, K., & Schmid, C. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2005.188 · Cited by 6,723
A comparison of affine region detectors
Mikolajczyk, K., Tuytelaars, T., Schmid, C., Zisserman, A., Matas, J., Schaffalitzky, F., Kadir, T., & Gool, L. V. (2005) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-005-3848-x · Cited by 2,939
Zhang, J., Marszałek, M., Lazebnik, S., & Schmid, C. (2007) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-006-9794-4 · Cited by 1,923
A performance evaluation of local descriptors
Mikolajczyk, K., & Schmid, C. (2003) · 2003 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2003. Proceedings. · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2003.1211478 · Cited by 955
Metadata
- Authors
- Opelt, A., Fussenegger, M., Pinz, A., & Auer, P.
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2004
- Pages
- 71-84
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W1496659369
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 26.29
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Weak Hypotheses and Boosting for Generic Object Detection and Recognition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-540-24671-8_6
- The paper
- Opelt, A., Fussenegger, M., Pinz, A., & Auer, P. (2004). Weak Hypotheses and Boosting for Generic Object Detection and Recognition. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24671-8_6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
