Econometric Analysis of Count Data
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
None of the cited ZIP model contributions has analysed the role of exposure to risk in terms of distance driven.
“none of these contributions has analysed the role of exposure to risk in terms of distance driven.”
From The Use of Telematics Devices to Improve Automobile Insurance Rates (2019) · cites this paper as Winkelmann, 2003
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 8 · Cited by 945
- Authors
- Winkelmann, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Zurich (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Winkelmann, Rainer
- ORCID
- Winkelmann, Rainer
- Venue
- Springer eBooks
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2003
- OpenAlex
- W1583862312
- Cited by
- 945
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 78 · 2013: 64 · 2012: 62
- FWCI
- 7.79
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
- Keywords
- count data, Poisson regression, unobserved heterogeneity, state dependence, selectivity, endogeneity, underreporting, cluster sampling, Bayesian inference, frequentist inference, copulas, semiparametric models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review