Voice Stress Analysis
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Jitter and shimmer occur relatively independent from prosodic patterns.
“Moreover, jitter and shimmer have an additional value to the information derived from F0 fluctuations because they occur relatively independent from prosodic patterns (Rothkrantz et al., 2004).”
From Voice Stress Analysis: A New Framework for Voice and Effort in Human Performance (2018) · cites this paper as Rothkrantz et al., 2004
In Rothkrantz et al. (2004), high frequency energy was, contrary to the stated hypothesis, more present at a presentation delay of 2 and 2.5 s than the short delays at the end of the experiment.
“High frequency energy was, in contrary to the stated hypothesis, more present at a presentation delay of 2 and 2.5 s than the short delays at the end of the experiment (Rothkrantz et al., 2004).”
From Voice Stress Analysis: A New Framework for Voice and Effort in Human Performance (2018) · cites this paper as Rothkrantz et al. (2004)
Rothkrantz et al. (2004) found a significant increase in F0, F0-variation and a significant decrease in jitter.
“They found a significant increase in F0, F0-variation and a significant decrease in jitter.”
From Voice Stress Analysis: A New Framework for Voice and Effort in Human Performance (2018) · cites this paper as Rothkrantz et al. (2004)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Voice Stress Analysis: A New Framework for Voice and Effort in Human Performance
Van Puyvelde, M., Neyt, X., McGlone, F., & Pattyn, N. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01994 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
“, 1985) than during cognitive load (Brenner and Shipp, 1988; Brenner et al., 1994).”
BackgroundInfluentialEffect of cognitive load on speech prosody in aviation: evidence from military simulator flights.
Huttunen, K., Keränen, H., Väyrynen, E., Pääkkönen, R., & Leino, T. (2011) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2010.08.005 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Goemaere, S., Van Caelenberg, T., Beyers, W., Binsted, K., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2019) · Acta Astronautica · doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.03.059 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Do speech features for detecting cognitive load depend on specific languages?
Chen, R., Xie, T., Xie, Y., Lin, T., & Tang, N. (2016) · Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction · doi:10.1145/2993148.2993149 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rothkrantz, L. J. M., Wiggers, P., van Wees, J.-W. A., & van Vark, R. J.
- Affiliations
- Delft University of Technology (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Wiggers, Pascal
- ORCID
- Wiggers, Pascal
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2004
- Pages
- 449-456
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W1571655350
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 6.44
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Voice and Speech Disorders
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
- Keywords
- voice stress analysis, psychological stress, workload, acoustic voice features, Stroop task, speech production, loudness, fundamental frequency, jitter, zero-crossing rate, speech rate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
