CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 74Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningEducational Technology and AssessmentVisual and Cognitive Learning Processes

Web-Based Intelligent Multimedia Tutoring for High Stakes Achievement Tests

Arroyo, Ivon, Beal, Carole, Murray, Tom, Walles, Rena, Woolf, Beverly P.·2004·Lecture notes in computer science
DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-30139-4_44
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-540-30139-4_44

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Early designs of interactive tutoring aids comprised rule-based systems mirroring interactions between expert teacher and student or between peer companions.

    “Early designs of interactive tutoring aids for teaching and support comprised of rule-based systems mirroring interactions between expert teacher and student (Arroyo et al., 2004; Olney et al., 2012) or between peer companions (Movellan et al., 2009).”

    From Proactive and reactive engagement of artificial intelligence methods for education: a review (2023) · cites this paper as Arroyo et al., 2004

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 10 · Cited by 74

Authors
Arroyo, I., Beal, C., Murray, T., Walles, R., & Woolf, B. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
ORCID
Venue
Lecture notes in computer science
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published
2004
Pages
468-477
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
DOI
10.1007/978-3-540-30139-4_44
OpenAlex
W2114523733
Cited by
74
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.94
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Keywords
intelligent tutoring systems, Scholastic Aptitude Test, mathematics tutoring, multimedia animation, narrative-based learning, mental rotation, adaptive tutoring, teaching methods

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review