The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toward the Accurate Identification of Network Applications
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, relying solely on port numbers has been shown to be ineffective [125,228,320], largely due to the use of dynamic port negotiation, tunneling and misuse of port numbers assigned to well-known applications for obfuscating traffic and avoiding firewalls [54,109,176,286].”
From A comprehensive survey on machine learning for networking: Evolution, applications and research opportunities (2018) · cites this paper as [320]
Citations
Cites
Snort - Lightweight Intrusion Detection for Networks
Roesch, M. (1999) · Cited by 3,094
Packet-level traffic measurements from the sprint IP backbone
Fraleigh, C., Moon, S. B., Lyles, B., Cotton, C., Khan, M., Moll, D., Rockell, R., Seely, T., & Diot, C. (2003) · IEEE Network · doi:10.1109/mnet.2003.1248656 · Cited by 639
The CoralReef Software Suite as a Tool for System and Network Administrators
Moore, D., Keys, K., Koga, R., Lagache, E., & claffy, K. (2001) · Cited by 114
Architecture of a network monitor
Moore, A. W., Hall, J., Kreibich, C., Harris, E. P., & Pratt, I. (2003) · Cited by 101
Self-citationContent-aware Internet application traffic measurement and analysis
Choi, T., Kim, C., Yoon, S., Park, J., Lee, B. J., Kim, H., Chung, H., & Jeong, T. S. (2004) · IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium (NOMS) · doi:10.1109/noms.2004.1317737 · Cited by 45
(2004) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-1-932266-82-5.x5000-4 · Cited by 34
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Moore, A.: Discrete content-based classification — a data set. Technical Report, Intel Research, Cambridge (2005)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A survey of techniques for internet traffic classification using machine learning
Nguyen, T. T. T., & Armitage, G. (2008) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/surv.2008.080406 · Cited by 1,664
Internet traffic classification using bayesian analysis techniques
Moore, A. W., & Zuev, D. V. (2005) · ACM SIGMETRICS International Conference on Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems (SIGMETRICS) · doi:10.1145/1064212.1064220 · Cited by 1,216
Self-citationBoutaba, R., Salahuddin, M. A., Limam, N., Ayoubi, S., Shahriar, N., Estrada-Solano, F., & Caicedo, O. M. (2018) · Journal of Internet Services and Applications · doi:10.1186/s13174-018-0087-2 · Cited by 1,036
Karagiannis, T., Papagiannaki, K., & Faloutsos, M. (2005) · ACM SIGCOMM Conference (SIGCOMM) · doi:10.1145/1080091.1080119 · Cited by 997
Self-citationTraffic classification using clustering algorithms
Erman, J., Arlitt, M. F., & Mahanti, A. (2006) · doi:10.1145/1162678.1162679 · Cited by 712
Metadata
- Authors
- Moore, A. W., & Papagiannaki, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Intel (United States) (US)
- ORCID
- Moore, Andrew W.
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2005
- Pages
- 41-54
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W1521553548
- Cited by
- 801
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 56
- FWCI
- 25.93
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Intel Corporation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Network Packet Processing and Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
- Keywords
- network traffic classification, content-based classification, packet payload analysis, firewall bypass, network traffic measurement, packet traces
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review