Symstra: A Framework for Generating Object-Oriented Unit Tests Using Symbolic Execution
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prior work on detecting discrimination has focused on measuring correlation or mutual information between inputs and outputs, discrepancies in fractions of inputs that produce a given output, or discrepancies in output probability distributions.
“Prior work on detecting discrimination has focused on measuring correlation or mutual information between inputs and outputs [79], discrepancies in the fractions of inputs that produce a given output [18, 19, 39-42, 87-89, 91], or discrepancies in output probability distributions [51].”
From Fairness testing: testing software for discrimination (2017) · cites this paper as [87]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 287
- Authors
- Xie, T., Marinov, D., Schulte, W., & Notkin, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Microsoft (United States) (US)
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2005
- Pages
- 365-381
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W1845288303
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 19.61
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Ames Research Center
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, programming, and type systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
- Keywords
- unit test generation, object-oriented software, symbolic execution, state comparison, branch coverage
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review