Early Systems Biology and Prebiotic Networks
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
With a catalytic intensity cut-off below which β elements are set to zero, most randomly formed GARD compositional assemblies will not be RAF.
“With such a modification, most randomly formed GARD compositional assemblies will not be RAF.”
From Systems protobiology: origin of life in lipid catalytic networks (2018) · cites this paper as [91]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 13
- Authors
- Shenhav, B., Solomon, A., Lancet, D., & Kafri, R.
- Affiliations
- Crown Human Genome Center (IL)
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2005
- Pages
- 14-27
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W2294414685
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 5.08
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Origins and Evolution of Life
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
- Keywords
- prebiotic chemistry, origin of life, network motifs, network robustness, weighted networks, degree distribution, random networks, scale-free networks, emergence of complexity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
