Correlated Keystreams in Moustique
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The rebound attack demonstrated a non-random property in 8-round AES-128.
“The situation is different in weaker attack models, where the related-key cryptanalysis was applied to the full versions of AES-192 and AES-256 [9], and the rebound attack demonstrated a non-random property in 8-round AES-128 [25,30].”
From Biclique Cryptanalysis of the Full AES (2011) · cites this paper as [30]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Biclique Cryptanalysis of the Full AES
Bogdanov, A., Khovratovich, D., & Rechberger, C. (2011) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-25385-0_19 · Cited by 546 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Käsper, E., Rijmen, V., Bjørstad, T. E., Rechberger, C., Robshaw, M., & Sekar, G.
- Affiliations
- KU Leuven (BE)
- Graz University of Technology (AT)
- University of Bergen (NO)
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2008-05-30
- Pages
- 246-257
- OpenAlex
- W2101644637
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 1.49
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- lirias.kuleuven.be
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Lirias (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptographic Implementations and Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Coding theory and cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cryptography and Residue Arithmetic
- Keywords
- stream ciphers, related-key attacks, key recovery attack, eSTREAM, exhaustive search
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review