Social Multi-Criteria Evaluation for a Sustainable Economy

Munda, Giuseppe·2008·Springer eBooks

DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-73703-2

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-540-73703-2

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Soil “ecosystem” services and natural capital: critical appraisal of research on uncertain ground
Baveye, P. C., Baveye, J., & Gowdy, J. (2016) · Frontiers in Environmental Science · doi:10.3389/fenvs.2016.00041 · Cited by 446
Empirical evaluation of agricultural sustainability using composite indicators
Gómez-Limón, J. A., & Sanchez-Fernandez, G. (2010) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.027 · Cited by 424
Ratings and Rankings: Voodoo or Science?
Paruolo, P., Saisana, M., & Saltelli, A. (2013) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society · doi:10.1111/j.1467-985x.2012.01059.x · Cited by 349
What is wrong with evidence based policy, and how can it be improved?
Saltelli, A., & Giampietro, M. (2017) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2016.11.012 · Cited by 264
Navigating uncertainty in environmental composite indicators
Burgass, M. J., Halpern, B. S., Nicholson, E., & Milner-Gulland, E. J. (2017) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.12.034 · Cited by 176
Choosing Aggregation Rules for Composite Indicators
Munda, G. (2012) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-011-9911-9 · Cited by 88
Self-citation
Rice farming sustainability assessment in Bangladesh
Roy, R., Chan, N. W., & Rainis, R. (2014) · Sustainability Science · doi:10.1007/s11625-013-0234-4 · Cited by 51

Authors: Munda, G.
Venue: Springer eBooks
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published: 2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-73703-2
OpenAlex: W593784137
Cited by: 514
References: 0
FWCI: 5.01
Type: book
Language: en
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review