Cited by 179Speech Recognition and SynthesisSpeech and Audio ProcessingBiometric Identification and Security

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

An Introduction to Application-Independent Evaluation of Speaker Recognition Systems

van Leeuwen, David A., Brümmer, Niko·2007·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-540-74200-5_19

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 18 · Cited by 179

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Martin, A.: Evaluations of Automatic Speaker Classification Systems. In: Müller, C. (ed.) Speaker Classification I. LNCS(LNAI), vol. 4343, Springer, Heidelberg (2007) · DOI
  2. Martin, A., Doddington, G., Kamm, T., Ordowski, M., Przybocki, M.: The DET curve in assessment of detection task performance. In: Proc. Eurospeech 1997, Rhodes, Greece, pp. 1895–1898 (1997) · DOI
  3. Brümmer, N.: Application-independent evaluation of speaker detection. In: Proc. Odyssey, Speaker and Language recognition workshop, ISCA 2004, pp. 33–40 (2004)
  4. Brümmer, N., du Preez, J.: Application-independent evaluation of speaker detection. Computer Speech and Language 20, 230–275 (2006) · DOI
  5. Campbell, W.M., Reynolds, D.A., Campbell, L.P., Brady, K.J.: Estimating and evaluating confidence for forensic speaker recognition. In: Proc. ICASSP, pp. 717–720 (2005) · DOI
  6. Campbell, W.M., Brady, K.J., Campbell, J.P., Granvile, R., Reynolds, D.A.: Understanding scores in forensic speaker recognition. In: Proc. Odyssey 2006 Speaker and Language Recognition Workshop (2006) · DOI
  7. Ramos-Castro, D., González-Rodríguez, J., Ortega-Garcia, J.: Likelihood ratio calibration in a transparent and testable forensic speaker recognition framework. In: Proc. Odyssey 2006 Speaker and Language Recognition Workshop (2006) · DOI
  8. Brümmer, N., van Leeuwen, D.A.: On calibration of language recognition scores. In: Proc. Odyssey 2006 Speaker and Language recognition workshop (2006) · DOI
  9. Auckenthaler, R., Carey, M., Lloyd-Thomas, H.: Score normalization for text-independetn speaker verification systems. Digital Signal Processing 10, 42–54 (2000) · DOI
  10. Navrátil, J., Ramsawamy, G.N.: The awe and mistery of t-norm. In: Proc. Eurospeech, pp. 2009–2012 (2003) · DOI
  11. Van Leeuwen, D.A., Martin, A.F., Przybocki, M.A., Bouten, J.S.: NIST and TNO-NFI evaluations of automatic speaker recognition. Computer Speech and Language 20, 128–158 (2006) · DOI
  12. Swets, J.A.: Signal detection and recognition by human observers; contemporary readings. Wiley, New York (1964)
  13. Green, D.M., Swets, J.A.: Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. Wiley, New York (1966)
  14. Doddington, G.R., Przybocki, M.A., Martin, A.F., Reynolds, D.A.: The NIST speaker recognition evaluation—Overview, methodology, systems, results, perspective. Speech Communication 31, 225–254 (2000) · DOI

Metadata

Authors
van Leeuwen, D. A., & Brümmer, N.
Affiliations
Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (NL)
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2007
Pages
330-353
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W1481604723
Cited by
179
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 8
FWCI
4.55
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • TNO Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Repository hosted by TU Delft Library (TU Delft) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Biometric Identification and Security
Keywords
score calibration, speaker detection, NIST Speaker Recognition Evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review