Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.

Software Evolution

Open access
Mens, Tom, Demeyer, Serge·2008·Springer eBooks

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-540-76440-3

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Lehman, M.M., Belady, L.A.: Program Evolution: Processes of Software Change. Apic Studies In Data Processing. Academic Press (1985)
  2. Lawrence, M.: An examination of evolution dynamics. In: Proc. Int'l Conf. Software Engineering (ICSE), IEEE Computer Society Press (1982) 188 -196
  3. Sommerville, I.: Software Engineering. 6th edn. Addison-Wesley (2001)
  4. Lehman, M., Ramil, J.: An overview of some lessons learnt in FEAST. In: Proc. WESS. (2002)
  5. Aoyama, M.: Metrics and analysis of software architecture evolution with discon- tinuity. In: Proc. Int'l Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution (IWPSE), Orlando, Florida (2002) 103 -107
  6. Bennett, K.H., Rajlich, V.T.: Software Maintenance and Evolution: A Roadmap. In: The Future of Software Engineering. ACM Press (2000) 75-87
  7. Godfrey, M.W., Tu, Q.: Evolution in open source software: A case study. In: Proc. Int'l Conf. Software Maintenance (ICSM), Los Alamitos, California, IEEE Computer Society Press (2000) 131-142
  8. Raymond, E.S.: The cathedral and the bazaar: musings on Linux and open source by an accidental revolutionary. Revised edn. O'Reilly & Associates, Inc., pub-ORA:adr (2001)
  9. Pirzada, S.S.: A Statistical Examination of the Evolution of the Unix System. PhD thesis, Department of Computing, Imperial College, London (1988)
  10. Gall, H., Jazayeri, M., René. Klösch, Trausmuth, G.: Software evolution obser- vations based on product release history. In: Proc. Int'l Conf. Software Mainte- nance (ICSM), IEEE Computer Society Press (1997) 160-166
  11. Paulson, J.W., Succi, G., Eberlein, A.: An empirical study of open-source and closed-source software products. IEEE Computer Society Trans. Software En- gineering 30 (2004) 246-256
  12. Herraiz, I., Robles, G., Gonzalez-Barahona, J.M., Capiluppi, A., Ramil, J.F.: Comparison between slocs and number of files as size metrics for software evo- lution analysis. In: Proc. European Conf. Software Maintenance and Reengi- neering (CSMR), Bari, Italy (2006)
  13. Wu, J., Spitzer, C.W., Hassan, A.E., Holt, R.C.: Evolution spectrographs: Vi- sualizing punctuated change in software evolution. In: Proc. Int'l Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution (IWPSE), Kyoto, Japan, IEEE Computer Society Press (2004) 57-66
  14. Wu, J.: Open Source Software Evolution and Its Dynamics. PhD thesis, Uni- versity of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada (2006)
  15. Capiluppi, A., Morisio, M., Ramil, J.F.: The evolution of source folder structure in actively evolved open source systems. In: Proc. IEEE Symp. Software Metrics, IEEE Computer Society Press (2004) 2-13
  16. Capiluppi, A., Morisio, M., Ramil, J.F.: Structural evolution of an open source system: A case study. In: Int'l Workshop on Program Comprehension. (2004) 172-182
  17. Capiluppi, A., Ramil, J.F.: Studying the evolution of open source systems at different levels of granularity: Two case studies. In: Proc. Int'l Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution (IWPSE), IEEE Computer Society (2004) 113-118
  18. Fowler, M.: Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code. Addison- Wesley, Boston, MA, USA (1999)
  19. Kitchenham, B.A., Pfleeger, S.L., Hoaglin, D.C., Rosenberg, J.: Preliminary guidelines for empirical research in software engineering. IEEE Computer Soci- ety Trans. Software Engineering 28 (2002) 721 -734

Cited by

See all 123

Metadata

Authors
Mens, T., & Demeyer, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Mons (BE)
  • University of Antwerp (BE)
Venue
Springer eBooks
Published
2008
OpenAlex
W4232707096
Cited by
111
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
FWCI
4.52
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
  • ORBi UMONS (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
Keywords
software evolution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Software Evolution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-540-76440-3
The paper
Mens, T., & Demeyer, S. (2008). Software Evolution. Springer eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76440-3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.