The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the Indifferentiability of the Sponge Construction
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Handbook of applied cryptography
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-4512 · Cited by 10,357
Cited by
Ascon v1.2: Lightweight Authenticated Encryption and Hashing
Dobraunig, C., Eichlseder, M., Mendel, F., & Schläffer, M. (2021) · Journal of Cryptology · doi:10.1007/s00145-021-09398-9 · Cited by 478
BLAKE2: Simpler, Smaller, Fast as MD5
Aumasson, J.-P., Neves, S., Wilcox-O’Hearn, Z., & Winnerlein, C. (2013) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-38980-1_8 · Cited by 303
Status report on the third round of the NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standardization process
Alagic, G., Apon, D., Cooper, D., Dang, Q., Dang, T., Kelsey, J., Lichtinger, J., Liu, Y.-K., Miller, C., Moody, D., et al. (2022) · doi:10.6028/nist.ir.8413-upd1 · Cited by 301
Aumasson, J.-P., Henzen, L., Meier, W., & Naya-Plasencia, M. (2010) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-15031-9_1 · Cited by 277
Implementation and practical problems of chaos-based cryptography revisited
Teh, J. S., Alawida, M., & Sii, Y. C. (2020) · Journal of Information Security and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jisa.2019.102421 · Cited by 104
Metadata
- Authors
- Bertoni, G., Daemen, J., Peeters, M., & Van Assche, G.
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2008
- Pages
- 181-197
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W1553650484
- Cited by
- 425
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.63
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the Indifferentiability of the Sponge Construction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-540-78967-3_11
- The paper
- Bertoni, G., Daemen, J., Peeters, M., & Van Assche, G. (2008). On the Indifferentiability of the Sponge Construction. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78967-3_11
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
