The Next Step towards a Function Markup Language
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Concepts regarding higher-level aspects, such as function combination and function-to-behavior mapping, are less well understood.
“Concepts regarding higherlevel aspects, such as function combination and function to behavior mapping are less well understood (Heylen et al., 2008; Cafaro et al., 2014).”
From Modeling Feedback in Interaction With Conversational Agents—A Review (2022) · cites this paper as Heylen et al., 2008
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 22 · Cited by 70
- Authors
- Heylen, D., Kopp, S., Marsella, S. C., Pelachaud, C., & Vilhjálmsson, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Twente (NL)
- Bielefeld University (DE)
- University of Southern California (US)
- Reykjavík University (IS)
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2008-08-23
- Pages
- 270-280
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W2148338187
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 2.72
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- research.utwente.nl
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
- Keywords
- multimodal communication, robot behavior, virtual agents, representation languages, communicative intention
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review