Effects of Task Difficulty and Training of Visuospatial Working Memory Task on Brain Activity
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
To address potential non-independence, the synthesis was re-run after excluding potentially overlapping studies with shared first authors, retaining only one study per first-author set.
“To address potential non-independence, we re-ran the synthesis after excluding potentially overlapping studies with shared first authors31,48,54,60,67, retaining only one study per first-author set.”
From Meta-analysis of computerised working memory training: behavioural gains, training parameters, transfer mechanisms, and neural correlates (2026) · cites this paper as [31]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 21 · Cited by 6
- Authors
- Ando, T., Momose, K., Tanaka, K., & Saito, K.
- Affiliations
- Waseda University (JP)
- Tokyo Denki University (JP)
- Venue
- IFMBE Proceedings
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2009
- Pages
- 657-660
- ISSN
- 1433-9277 (ISSN-L)
- 1680-0737
- OpenAlex
- W200197579
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, September 7 - 12, 2009, Munich, Germany (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- visuospatial working memory, task difficulty, working memory training, brain activity, prefrontal cortex, Brodmann area 10, Brodmann area 46, neural mechanisms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
