Cited by 94Animal Vocal Communication and BehaviorPrimate Behavior and EcologyAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

Vocal communication in social groups

Fichtel, Claudia, Manser, Marta·2010·Animal Behaviour: Evolution and Mechanisms

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-642-02624-9_2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 140 · Cited by 94

Authors
Fichtel, C., & Manser, M.
Affiliations
  • German Primate Center (DE)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
Venue
Animal Behaviour: Evolution and Mechanisms
Published
2010
Pages
29-54
OpenAlex
W180739275
Cited by
94
References
140
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.64
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • GRO (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
vocal communication, social groups, audience effects, eavesdropping, group coordination, communication networks, bystanders, cooperation, coalition formation, group cohesion, decision-making, repeated interaction, animal communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review