The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Debugging Method Names
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
code2vec: Learning distributed representations of code
Alon, U., Zilberstein, M., Levy, O., & Yahav, E. (2019) · Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages · doi:10.1145/3290353 · Cited by 962
On the naturalness of software
Hindle, A., Barr, E. T., Su, Z., Gabel, M., & Devanbu, P. (2012) · 2012 34th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) · doi:10.1109/icse.2012.6227135 · Cited by 425
On the naturalness of software
Hindle, A., Barr, E. T., Gabel, M., Su, Z., & Devanbu, P. (2016) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/2902362 · Cited by 307
Neural reverse engineering of stripped binaries using augmented control flow graphs
David, Y., Alon, U., & Yahav, E. (2020) · Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages · doi:10.1145/3428293 · Cited by 84
A general path-based representation for predicting program properties
Alon, U., Zilberstein, M., Levy, O., & Yahav, E. (2018) · Proceedings of the 39th ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation · doi:10.1145/3192366.3192412 · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- Høst, E. W., & Østvold, B. M.
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2009
- Pages
- 294-317
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W1608271177
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.97
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Debugging Method Names. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-642-03013-0_14
- The paper
- Høst, E. W., & Østvold, B. M. (2009). Debugging Method Names. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03013-0_14
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
