The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evaluation of User Interface Design and Input Methods for Applications on Mobile Touch Screen Devices
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Touchscreen interfaces may make it easier for users to complete tasks and contributes to the popularity and success of touchscreen devices.
“Although the design of applications running on devices is critical, touchscreen interfaces may make it easier for users to complete tasks and contributes to the popularity and success of touchscreen devices (Balagtas-Fernandez et al., 2009).”
From Older Adults Perceptions of Technology and Barriers to Interacting with Tablet Computers: A Focus Group Study (2017) · cites this paper as Balagtas-Fernandez et al., 2009
Without physical responses, users have less confidence on the consequences of their actions which eventually compromise system usability.
“Without physical responses, users have less confidence on the consequences of their actions which eventually compromise system usability [59].”
From Usability Studies on Mobile User Interface Design Patterns: A Systematic Literature Review (2017) · cites this paper as [59]
Participants preferred clear or smooth tactile clicks over dull ones for virtual buttons.
“The results found that participants preferred the clear or smooth tactile clicks over dull ones for virtual buttons [59].”
From Usability Studies on Mobile User Interface Design Patterns: A Systematic Literature Review (2017) · cites this paper as [59]
Scrolling, modal dialogue, and device menu were more efficient.
“The results indicated that the scrolling, modal dialogue, and the device menu were more efficient [113].”
From Usability Studies on Mobile User Interface Design Patterns: A Systematic Literature Review (2017) · cites this paper as [113]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Weiss, S.: Handheld Usability. John Wiley and Sons Ltd., Chichester (2002) · DOI
- Oehl, M., Sutter, C., Ziefle, M.: Considerations on efficient touch interfaces – how display size influences the performance in an applied pointing task. In: Smith, M.J., Salvendy, G. (eds.) HCII 2007. LNCS, vol. 4557, pp. 136–143. Springer, Heidelberg (2007) · DOI
- Hoggan, E., Brewster, S.A., Johnston, J.: Investigating the effectiveness of tactile feedback for mobile touchscreens. In: Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, Florence (2008)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Vaportzis, E., Giatsi Clausen, M., & Gow, A. J. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01687 · Cited by 916
“Although the design of applications running on devices is critical, touchscreen interfaces may make it easier for users to complete tasks and contributes to the popularity and success of touchscreen devices (Balagtas-Fernandez et al., 2009).”
BackgroundUsability Studies on Mobile User Interface Design Patterns: A Systematic Literature Review
Punchoojit, L., & Hongwarittorrn, N. (2017) · Advances in Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1155/2017/6787504 · Cited by 235
Metadata
- Authors
- Balagtas-Fernandez, F., Forrai, J., & Hussmann, H.
- Affiliations
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
- ORCID
- Hussmann, Heinrich
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2009
- Pages
- 243-246
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W74922519
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 2.72
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Interactive and Immersive Displays
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Keywords
- user interface design, input methods, touchscreen devices, mobile devices, usability evaluation, social media applications, Android, prototype
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
