Avatars@Home
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ECAs are found pleasant by most elderly people.
“Secondly, ECAs are found pleasant by most elderly people, attract attention better than other modalities and their use yields better task performance.”
From Field evaluation with cognitively-impaired older adults of attention management in the Embodied Conversational Agent Louise (2016) · cites this paper as [8]
ECAs are better media to convey information and provide guidance to older adults with cognitive impairment than text and disembodied speech.
“To sum up, firstly, the studies presented here suggest that ECAs are better media to convey information and provide guidance to older adults with cognitive impairment than text and disembodied speech.”
From Field evaluation with cognitively-impaired older adults of attention management in the Embodied Conversational Agent Louise (2016) · cites this paper as [8]
Use of ECAs yields better task performance.
“Secondly, ECAs are found pleasant by most elderly people, attract attention better than other modalities and their use yields better task performance.”
From Field evaluation with cognitively-impaired older adults of attention management in the Embodied Conversational Agent Louise (2016) · cites this paper as [8]
ECAs attract attention better than other modalities.
“Secondly, ECAs are found pleasant by most elderly people, attract attention better than other modalities and their use yields better task performance.”
From Field evaluation with cognitively-impaired older adults of attention management in the Embodied Conversational Agent Louise (2016) · cites this paper as [8]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 11 · Cited by 8
- Authors
- Morandell, M. M., Hochgatterer, A., Wöckl, B., Dittenberger, S., & Fagel, S.
- Affiliations
- AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH (AT)
- Center for Usability Research and Engineering (AT)
- Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2009
- Pages
- 353-365
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W2912228587
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2018: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.62
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
- Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Keywords
- avatars, ambient assisted living, home automation, elderly users, mild cognitive impairment, graphical user interface, Wizard of Oz, usability, speech interfaces, task performance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
