The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
No-Look Notes: Accessible Eyes-Free Multi-touch Text Entry
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Most work on non-visual text-entry for people with visual impairments has focused on the comparison of input techniques reporting on performance measures, such as accuracy and speed.”
From Typing Performance of Blind Users (2015) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“While researchers have been able to establish that non-visual input is slow and error prone, there is little understanding on how to improve it.”
From Typing Performance of Blind Users (2015) · cites this paper as [3]
Citations
Cites
Carayannis, E. G. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-3858-8_100431 · Cited by 4,819
Phrase sets for evaluating text entry techniques
MacKenzie, I. S., & Soukoreff, R. W. (2003) · CHI '03 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '03 · doi:10.1145/765891.765971 · Cited by 825
Text Entry for Mobile Computing: Models and Methods, Theory and Practice
MacKenzie, I. S., & Soukoreff, R. W. (2002) · Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1207/s15327051hci172&3_2 · Cited by 571
Kane, S. K., Bigham, J. P., & Wobbrock, J. O. (2008) · Proceedings of the 10th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility · doi:10.1145/1414471.1414487 · Cited by 374 · cited 2×
“The split-tapping technique, developed by Slide Rule as a tool for making selections off of lists [11], proved effective at selecting arbitrarily located targets, provided the targets were large enough.”
MethodEdgeWrite: a stylus-based text entry method designed for high accuracy and stability of motion
Wobbrock, J. O., Myers, B. A., & Kembel, J. A. (2003) · Proceedings of the 16th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology · doi:10.1145/964696.964703 · Cited by 355
Tactile feedback for mobile interactions
Brewster, S. A., Chohan, F., & Brown, L. (2007) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1240624.1240649 · Cited by 313
Perlin, K. (1998) · ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST) · doi:10.1145/288392.288613 · Cited by 265
Wigdor, D., & Balakrishnan, R. (2003) · ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST) · doi:10.1145/964696.964705 · Cited by 202
SemFeel: a user interface with semantic tactile feedback for mobile touch-screen devices
Yatani, K., & Truong, K. N. (2009) · Proceedings of the 22nd annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology · doi:10.1145/1622176.1622198 · Cited by 164
Investigating touchscreen accessibility for people with visual impairments
McGookin, D., Brewster, S., & Jiang, W. (2008) · Proceedings of the 5th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction: building bridges · doi:10.1145/1463160.1463193 · Cited by 151 · cited 1×
“Unfortunately, as discussed by McGookin et al. [1], the creation of accessible modifications and enhancements for touch-based devices is lagging behind the breakneck pace of mainstream development.”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Kaaresoja, T.: Snap-Crackle-Pop: Tactile Feedback for Mobile Touch Screens. In: Proceedings of Eurohaptics, pp. 565–566 (2006)
- Black, A., Lenzo, K.: Flite: A Small Fast Runtime Synthesis Engine. In: 4th ISCA Speech Synthesis Workshop, pp. 157–162 (2007)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wobbrock, J. O., Kane, S. K., Gajos, K. Z., Harada, S., & Froehlich, J. E. (2011) · ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing · doi:10.1145/1952383.1952384 · Cited by 643
“Second-finger-tap was incorporated into Apple’s VoiceOver software as split-tap and in subsequent research projects like No-Look Notes (Bonner et al. 2010).”
Usable gestures for blind people: understanding preference and performance
Kane, S. K., Wobbrock, J. O., & Ladner, R. E. (2011) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1978942.1979001 · Cited by 314
“, [4,15]), the resulting systems have still been largely created by their designers.”
BackgroundInfluentialKhan, A., & Khusro, S. (2021) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-020-00733-8 · Cited by 177
“[189] presented a 12-key virtual keyboard approach.”
Exploring the use of speech input by blind people on mobile devices
Azenkot, S., & Lee, N. B. (2013) · Proceedings of the 15th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility · doi:10.1145/2513383.2513440 · Cited by 151
“Methods that were not based on Braille [9,25,34], including No-Look Notes [6] and NavTouch [22], did not achieve comparable performance to the former set.”
BackgroundCurrent and future mobile and wearable device use by people with visual impairments
Ye, H., Malu, M., Oh, U., & Findlater, L. (2014) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2556288.2557085 · Cited by 148
“Researchers have also tackled touchscreen mobile accessibility, both through software solutions that provide interaction with the screen and audio output [3,4,6,8,13,22], and through hardware solutions such as tactile overlays [18] and haptic output [12,17].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Bonner, M. N., Brudvik, J. T., Abowd, G. D., & Edwards, W. K.
- Affiliations
- Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2010
- Pages
- 409-426
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W1480985346
- Cited by
- 154
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 29.10
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
- Keywords
- multi-touch input, blind users, assistive technology, audio feedback, voice-over, iPhone
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
