Identifying Controversial Issues and Their Sub-topics in News Articles
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
If the two partitions are well-separated, then the cut will consist of edges that bridge structural holes.
“The intuition here is that, if the two partitions are well-separated, then the cut will consist of edges that bridge structural holes [7].”
From Quantifying controversy on social media (2018) · cites this paper as [7]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Quantifying controversy on social media
Garimella, K., Morales, G. D. F., Gionis, A., & Mathioudakis, M. (2018) · ACM Transactions on Social Computing · doi:10.1145/3140565 · Cited by 348 · see citing works
Quantifying Controversy in Social Media
Garimella, K., De Francisci Morales, G., Gionis, A., & Mathioudakis, M. (2016) · Proceedings of the Ninth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2835776.2835792 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
“In this case, the query “#beefban” defines a topic of discussion, and the related activity consists of all posts that contain the query.”
Background
- Authors
- Choi, Y., Jung, Y., & Myaeng, S.-H.
- Affiliations
- Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2010
- Pages
- 140-153
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W1776062713
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.78
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
- Keywords
- news articles, sentiment polarity, sentiment analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
