The Efficacy of Prototyping Under Time Constraints
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Dow and colleagues showed the possibility of developing better results through iteration, and a subsequent study examined the differences between parallel and iterative development versus serial and iterative development.
“For example, Dow and colleagues showed the possibility of developing better results through iteration [57] and a subsequent study examined the differences between parallel and iterative development versus serial and iterative development [58].”
From Agile science: creating useful products for behavior change in the real world (2016) · cites this paper as [58]
Individuals randomized to work on multiple ideas at once (parallel group) had greater openness to incorporating feedback and also produced better end products compared to the single iterative concept group.
“Results found that individuals randomized to work on multiple ideas at once (i.e., parallel group) had greater openness to incorporating feedback and also produced better end products compared to the single iterative concept group.”
From Agile science: creating useful products for behavior change in the real world (2016) · cites this paper as [58]
Individuals in the single concept group were less open to feedback and instead often "stayed the course."
“Individuals in the single concept group were less open to feedback and instead often “stayed the course.””
From Agile science: creating useful products for behavior change in the real world (2016) · cites this paper as [58]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 35
- Authors
- Dow, S. P., & Klemmer, S. R.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dow, Steven P.
- Venue
- Design Thinking
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2010-11-16
- Pages
- 111-128
- OpenAlex
- W4246118149
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 5.45
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Keywords
- iterative prototyping, time constraints, design iteration, task experience, production schedule
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
