The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Determining Time of Queries for Re-ranking Search Results
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“[Kanhabua and Nørvåg 2010] used a query's determined time to improve the reranking of the web page results.”
From Survey of Temporal Information Retrieval and Related Applications (2015) · cites this paper as Kanhabua and Nørvåg 2010
In the citing paper
“Finally, as observed by [Kanhabua and Nørvåg 2010], the fact that all these studies are built on top of temporal language models involves drawbacks concerning document collection.”
From Survey of Temporal Information Retrieval and Related Applications (2015) · cites this paper as Kanhabua and Nørvåg 2010
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Berberich, K., Bedathur, S., Alonso, O., Weikum, G.: A language modeling approach for temporal information needs. In: Proceedings of ECIR 2010 (2010) · DOI · Paper page
- Berberich, K., Bedathur, S.J., Neumann, T., Weikum, G.: A time machine for text search. In: Proceedings of SIGIR 2007 (2007) · DOI
- de Jong, F., Rode, H., Hiemstra, D.: Temporal language models for the disclosure of historical text. In: Proceedings of AHC 2005 (History and Computing) (2005)
- Diaz, F., Jones, R.: Using temporal profiles of queries for precision prediction. In: Proceedings of the 27th SIGIR (2004) · DOI
- Jatowt, A., Kawai, Y., Tanaka, K.: Temporal ranking of search engine results. In: Ngu, A.H.H., Kitsuregawa, M., Neuhold, E.J., Chung, J.-Y., Sheng, Q.Z. (eds.) WISE 2005. LNCS, vol. 3806, pp. 43–52. Springer, Heidelberg (2005) · DOI
- Kanhabua, N., Nørvåg, K.: Improving temporal language models for determining time of non-timestamped documents. In: Christensen-Dalsgaard, B., Castelli, D., Ammitzbøll Jurik, B., Lippincott, J. (eds.) ECDL 2008. LNCS, vol. 5173, pp. 358–370. Springer, Heidelberg (2008) · DOI · Paper page
- Kraaij, W.: Variations on language modeling for information retrieval. SIGIR Forum 39(1), 61 (2005) · DOI
- Li, X., Croft, W.B.: Time-based language models. In: Proceedings of CIKM (2003) · DOI · Paper page
- Metzler, D., Jones, R., Peng, F., Zhang, R.: Improving search relevance for implicitly temporal queries. In: Proceedings of SIGIR 2009 (2009) · DOI · Paper page
- Nørvåg, K.: Supporting temporal text-containment queries in temporal document databases. Journal of Data & Knowledge Engineering 49(1), 105–125 (2004) · DOI
- Nunes, S., Ribeiro, C., David, G.: Use of temporal expressions in web search. In: Macdonald, C., Ounis, I., Plachouras, V., Ruthven, I., White, R.W. (eds.) ECIR 2008. LNCS, vol. 4956, pp. 580–584. Springer, Heidelberg (2008) · DOI
- Perkiö, J., Buntine, W., Tirri, H.: A temporally adaptive content-based relevance ranking algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 28th SIGIR (2005) · DOI · Paper page
- Sato, N., Uehara, M., Sakai, Y.: Temporal ranking for fresh information retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 6th IRAL (2003) · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Survey of Temporal Information Retrieval and Related Applications
Campos, R., Dias, G., Jorge, A. M., & Jatowt, A. (2015) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2619088 · Cited by 262
Metadata
- Authors
- Kanhabua, N., & Nørvåg, K.
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2010
- Pages
- 261-272
- ISSN
- 0302-9743
- 1611-3349
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review