The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Detecting Ground Shadows in Outdoor Consumer Photographs
Open accessAbstract
Detecting shadows from images can significantly improve the performance of several vision tasks such as object detection and tracking. Recent approaches have mainly used illumination invariants which can fail severely when the qualities of the images are not very good, as is the case for most consumer-grade photographs, like those on Google or Flickr. We present a practical algorithm to automatically detect shadows cast by objects onto the ground, from a single consumer photograph. Our key hypothesis is that the types of materials constituting the ground in outdoor scenes is relatively limited, most commonly including asphalt, brick, stone, mud, grass, concrete, etc. As a result, the appearances of shadows on the ground are not as widely varying as general shadows and thus, can be learned from a labelled set of images. Our detector consists of a three-tier process including (a) training a decision tree classifier on a set of shadow sensitive features computed around each image edge, (b) a CRF-based optimization to group detected shadow edges to generate coherent shadow contours, and (c) incorporating any existing classifier that is specifically trained to detect grounds in images. Our results demonstrate good detection accuracy (85%) on several challenging images. Since most objects of interest to vision applications (like pedestrians, vehicles, signs) are attached to the ground, we believe that our detector can find wide applicability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bilateral Filtering for Gray and Color Images
Tomasi, C., & Manduchi, R. (2002) · Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36271) · doi:10.1109/iccv.1998.710815 · Cited by 8,177 · cited 1×
“To obtain these boundaries, we first smooth the image with a bilateral filter [20], compute gradient magnitudes on the filtered image, and then apply the watershed segmentation algorithm on the gradient map.”
MethodFast approximate energy minimization via graph cuts
Boykov, Y., Veksler, O., & Zabih, R. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.969114 · Cited by 6,988
Recovering Occlusion Boundaries from a Single Image
Hoiem, D., Stein, A. N., Efros, A. A., & Hebert, M. (2007) · 2007 IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2007.4408985 · Cited by 206
Self-citation
Cited by
Wang, J., Li, X., & Yang, J. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00192 · Cited by 465
Single-image shadow detection and removal using paired regions
Guo, R., Dai, Q., & Hoiem, D. (2011) · CVPR 2011 · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2011.5995725 · Cited by 295
Automatic Shadow Detection and Removal from a Single Image
Khan, S. H., Bennamoun, M., Sohel, F., & Togneri, R. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2015.2462355 · Cited by 283
Metadata
- Authors
- Lalonde, J.-F., Efros, A. A., & Narasimhan, S. G.
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2010
- Pages
- 322-335
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W1884470205
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.10
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detecting Ground Shadows in Outdoor Consumer Photographs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-642-15552-9_24
- The paper
- Lalonde, J.-F., Efros, A. A., & Narasimhan, S. G. (2010). Detecting Ground Shadows in Outdoor Consumer Photographs. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15552-9_24
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.