The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Recht ex machina
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Unambiguous, formalized legal terms are a prerequisite for a (partially) automated enforcement of laws in the form of 'if-then' rules.
“Unambiguous, formalized legal terms are a prerequisite for a (partially) automated enforcement of laws in the form of 'if-then' rules (Raabe et al., 2012).”
From Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Automation in Administrative Procedures: Potentials, Limitations, and Framework Conditions (2023) · cites this paper as Raabe et al., 2012
Legal informatics projects of the last 4 to 6 decades have not led to full automation of the actual subsumption process but have found their limits in assistance systems.
“This position is confirmed by legal informatics projects of the last 4 to 6 decades, which have not led to full automation of the actual subsumption process but have found their limits in assistance systems (Raabe et al., 2012).”
From Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Automation in Administrative Procedures: Potentials, Limitations, and Framework Conditions (2023) · cites this paper as Raabe et al., 2012
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Parycek, P., Schmid, V., & Novak, A.-S. (2023) · Journal of the Knowledge Economy · doi:10.1007/s13132-023-01433-3 · Cited by 131
“This position is confirmed by legal informatics projects of the last 4 to 6 decades, which have not led to full automation of the actual subsumption process but have found their limits in assistance systems (Raabe et al., 2012).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Raabe, O., Wacker, R., Oberle, D., Baumann, C., & Funk, C.
- Affiliations
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
- Venue
- Springer eBooks
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2012
- OpenAlex
- W2487511001
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 1.57
- Type
- book
- Language
- de
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Classical Philosophy and Thought
- Social Sciences › Law › Law in Society and Culture
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Legal and Social Philosophy
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence, AI regulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
