Cited by 109

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Static Task Partitioning Approach for Heterogeneous Systems Using OpenCL

Grewe, Dominik, O’Boyle, Michael F. P.·2011·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-642-19861-8_16

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Different amount of work-divisions to CPU and GPU can lead to vastly different performance.

    “Due to this, different amount of work-divisions to CPU and GPU can lead to vastly different performance [Grewe and O'Boyle 2011].”

    From A Survey of CPU-GPU Heterogeneous Computing Techniques (2015) · cites this paper as Grewe and O'Boyle 2011

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Augonnet, C., Thibault, S., Namyst, R.: Automatic Calibration of Performance Models on Heterogeneous Multicore Architectures. In: Lin, H.-X., Alexander, M., Forsell, M., Knüpfer, A., Prodan, R., Sousa, L., Streit, A. (eds.) Euro-Par 2009. LNCS, vol. 6043, pp. 56–65. Springer, Heidelberg (2010) · DOI
  2. Augonnet, C., Thibault, S., Namyst, R., Wacrenier, P.-A.: starPU: A unified platform for task scheduling on heterogeneous multicore architectures. In: Sips, H., Epema, D., Lin, H.-X. (eds.) Euro-Par 2009. LNCS, vol. 5704, pp. 863–874. Springer, Heidelberg (2009) · DOI
  3. Bishop, C.M.: Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning (Information Science and Statistics). Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., Secaucus (2006)
  4. Braun, T.D., Siegel, H.J., Beck, N., Bölöni, L., Maheswaran, M., Reuther, A.I., Robertson, J.P., Theys, M.D., Yao, B., Hensgen, D.A., Freund, R.F.: A comparison study of static mapping heuristics for a class of meta-tasks on heterogeneous computing systems. In: Heterogeneous Computing Workshop (1999)
  5. Buck, I., Foley, T., Horn, D.R., Sugerman, J., Fatahalian, K., Houston, M., Hanrahan, P.: Brook for GPUs: stream computing on graphics hardware. ACM Trans. Graph. 23(3) (2004) · DOI
  6. Danalis, A., Marin, G., McCurdy, C., Meredith, J.S., Roth, P.C., Spafford, K., Tipparaju, V., Vetter, J.S.: The scalable heterogeneous computing (SHOC) benchmark suite. In: GPGPU (2010) · DOI
  7. Diamos, G.F., Yalamanchili, S.: Harmony: an execution model and runtime for heterogeneous many core systems. In: HPDC (2008) · DOI
  8. Dolbeau, R., Bihan, S., Bodin, F.: HMPP: A hybrid multi-core parallel programming environment. In: Workshop on General Purpose Processing Using GPUs (2007)
  9. Ibarra, O.H., Kim, C.E.: Heuristic algorithms for scheduling independent tasks on nonidentical processors. J. ACM 24(2) (1977) · DOI
  10. Jiménez, V.J., Vilanova, L., Gelado, I., Gil, M., Fursin, G., Navarro, N.: Predictive runtime code scheduling for heterogeneous architectures. In: Seznec, A., Emer, J., O’Boyle, M., Martonosi, M., Ungerer, T. (eds.) HiPEAC 2009. LNCS, vol. 5409, pp. 19–33. Springer, Heidelberg (2009) · DOI
  11. Khokhar, A.A., Prasanna, V.K., Shaaban, M.E., Wang, C.-L.: Heterogeneous computing: Challenges and opportunities. IEEE Computer 26(6) (1993) · DOI
  12. Kumar, R., Tullsen, D.M., Jouppi, N.P., Ranganathan, P.: Heterogeneous chip multiprocessors. IEEE Computer 38(11) (2005) · DOI
  13. Linderman, M.D., Collins, J.D., Wang, H., Meng, T.H.Y.: Merge: a programming model for heterogeneous multi-core systems. In: ASPLOS (2008) · DOI
  14. Luk, C.-k., Hong, S., Kim, H.: Qilin: Exploiting parallelism on heterogeneous multiprocessors with adaptive mapping. In: MICRO (2009) · DOI
  15. Maheswaran, M., Siegel, H.J.: A dynamic matching and scheduling algorithm for heterogeneous computing systems. In: Heterogeneous Computing Workshop (1998)
  16. Ravi, V.T., Ma, W., Chiu, D., Agrawal, G.: Compiler and runtime support for enabling generalized reduction computations on heterogeneous parallel configurations. In: ICS (2010) · DOI
  17. Rifkin, R.M., Klautau, A.: In defense of one-vs-all classification. Journal of Machine Learning Research (2004)
  18. Ryoo, S., Rodrigues, C.I., Baghsorkhi, S.S., Stone, S.S., Kirk, D.B., Hwu, W.-m.W.: Optimization principles and application performance evaluation of a multithreaded GPU using CUDA. In: PPoPP (2008) · DOI
  19. Venkatasubramanian, S., Vuduc, R.W.: Tuned and wildly asynchronous stencil kernels for hybrid CPU/GPU systems. In: ICS (2009) · DOI
  20. Wolfe, M.: Implementing the PGI accelerator model. In: GPGPU (2010) · DOI
  21. Yarmolenko, V., Duato, J., Panda, D.K., Sadayappan, P.: Characterization and enhancement of dynamic mapping heuristics for heterogeneous systems. In: ICPP Workshops (2000)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Grewe, D., & O’Boyle, M. F. P.
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2011
Pages
286-305
ISSN
  • 0302-9743
  • 1611-3349
Cited by
109
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review