Cited by 22Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesAortic aneurysm repair treatmentsAnatomy and Medical Technology

An Image-Guided Surgery System to Aid Endovascular Treatment of Complex Aortic Aneurysms: Description and Initial Clinical Experience

Penney, Graeme, Varnavas, Andreas, Dastur, Neville, Carrell, Tom·2011·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-642-21504-9_2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Penney, G., Varnavas, A., Dastur, N., & Carrell, T.
Affiliations
St Thomas' Hospital (GB)
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2011
Pages
13-24
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W200789693
Cited by
22
References
0
Citations by year
2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.63
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Anatomy and Medical Technology
Keywords
image-guided surgery, aortic aneurysm, endovascular aneurysm repair, 2D-3D registration, fluoroscopy, 3D surface rendering, surgical guidance, registration accuracy, non-rigid deformation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review