Cited by 184Cryptographic Implementations and SecurityCoding theory and cryptographyCryptography and Residue Arithmetic

Breaking Grain-128 with Dynamic Cube Attacks

Dinur, Itai, Shamir, Adi·2011·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-642-21702-9_10

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A type of Cube attack (dynamic Cube attack) was applied to Grain-128 because the degree of NFSR feedback was low (2).

    “A type of Cube attack (i.e., dynamic Cube attack) was applied to Grain-128 [6,8] because the degree of NFSR feedback was low, i.e., 2.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dinur, I., & Shamir, A.
Affiliations
Weizmann Institute of Science (IL)
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2011
Volume
2010
Pages
167-187
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W97949831
Cited by
184
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 21
FWCI
15.52
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptographic Implementations and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Coding theory and cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cryptography and Residue Arithmetic
Keywords
Grain-128, cube attack, key recovery attack, stream ciphers, cryptanalysis, linear cryptanalysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review