Cited by 41Gaze Tracking and Assistive TechnologyHuman-Automation Interaction and SafetyEmotion and Mood Recognition

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pupillary Response Based Cognitive Workload Measurement under Luminance Changes

Open access
Xu, Jie, Wang, Yang, Chen, Fang, Choi, Eric·2011·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-642-23771-3_14

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Beatty, J.: Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources. Psychological Bulletin 91, 276–292 (1982) · DOI · Paper page
  2. Cain, B.: A review of the mental workload literature. Technical Report, Defence Research and Development Canada Toronto (2007)
  3. Chen, S., Epps, J., Ruiz, N., Chen, F.: Eye activity as a measure of human mental effort in HCI. In: International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 315–318 (2011) · DOI · Paper page
  4. Fogarty, C., Stern, J.: Eye movements and blinks: Their relationship to higher cognitive processes. International Journal of Psychophysiology 8, 35–42 (1989) · DOI
  5. Grootjen, M., Neerincx, M., Weert, J.: Task-based interpretation of operator state information for adaptive support. In: Schmorrow, D., Stanney, M., Reeves, M. (eds.) Foundations of Augmented Cognition, 2nd edn., pp. 236–242 (2006)
  6. Klingner, J., Kumar, R., Hanrahan, P.: Measuring the task-evoked pupillary response with a remote eye tracker. In: Eye Tracking Research and Applications Symposium, pp. 69–72 (2008) · DOI
  7. Kramer, A.: Physiological metrics of mental workload: A review of recent progress. In: Damos, D. (ed.) Multiple-Task Performance, pp. 279–328. Taylor and Francis, Abington (1991)
  8. Palinko, O., Kun, A., Shyrokov, A., Heeman, P.: Estimating cognitive load using remote eye tracking in a driving simulator. In: Eye Tracking Research and Applications Symposium, pp. 141–144 (2010) · DOI
  9. Pomplun, M., Sunkara, S.: Pupil dilation as an indicator of cognitive workload in human-computer interaction. In: International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 542–546 (2003)
  10. Quinlan, J.: C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (1993)
  11. Xu, J., Wang, Y., Chen, F., Choi, H., Li, G., Chen, S., Hussain, S.: Pupillary response based cognitive workload index under luminance and emotional changes. In: Annual Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1627–1632 (2011) · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Xu, J., Wang, Y., Chen, F., & Choi, E.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2011
Volume
LNCS-6947
Issue
Part II
Pages
178-185
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W75721161
Cited by
41
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4
FWCI
1.43
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Emotion and Mood Recognition
Keywords
pupillary response, mental workload, pupillometry, luminance changes, remote eye tracking, arithmetic exercises

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review