Gender Differences in Early Free and Open Source Software Joining Process
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Women tend to leave projects earlier than men.
“Unsurprisingly, women tend to leave projects earlier than men [13].”
From Codes of Conduct in Open Source (2024) · cites this paper as [13]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Community, joining, and specialization in open source software innovation: a case study
von Krogh, G., Spaeth, S., & Lakhani, K. R. (2003) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(03)00050-7 · Cited by 1,025 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Krogh et al. studied Freenet’s developer list for one year and find that of successful joiners, over three-quarters started a new thread, and that the 10% of participants who never received replies dropped out [13].”
Intrinsic motivation in open source software development
Bitzer, J., Schrettl, W., & Schröder, P. J. H. (2007) · Journal of Comparative Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jce.2006.10.001 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Fisher, A., Margolis, J.: Unlocking the Clubhouse: the Carnegie Mellon Experience. In: Proc. SIGCSE Bulletin, vol. 34, pp. 79-83 (2002)
- Gutwin, C., Penner, R., Schneider, K.: Group Awareness in Distributed Software Devel- opment. In: Proc. CSCS 2004, pp. 72-88. ACM Press (2004)
- Jensen, C., King, S., Kuechler, V.: Joining Free/Open Source Software Communities: An Analysis of Newbies' First Interactions on Project Mailing Lists. In: Proc. of HICSS 2011, pp. 1-10 (2011)
- Lakhani, K.R., Wolf, R.G.: The Boston Consulting Group Hacker Survey (2002), http://ftp3.au.freebsd.org/pub/linux.conf.au/2003/papers/Hem os/Hemos.pdf
- Lampe, C., Johnston, E.: Follow the (Slash) dot: Effects of Feedback on New Members in an Online Community. In: Proc. of the 2005 Int. Conf. on Supporting Group Work, pp. 11-20 (2005)
- Mason, B.: Issues in virtual ethnography. In: Proc. of Ethnographic Studies in Real and Virtual Environments: Inhabited Information Spaces and Connected Communities, pp. 61- 69 (1999)
- Nonnecke, B., Preece, J.: Lurker Demographics: Counting the Silent. In: CHI 2000, pp. 73-80. ACM Press (2000)
- Raymond, E.S.: The Cathedral & the Bazaar: Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary. O'Reilly, Beijing (1999)
- Soroka, V., Jacovi, M., Ur, S.: We can see you: a study of the community's invisible people through ReachOut. In: Huysman, M., Wenger, E., Wulf, V. (eds.) Proc. of Int. Conf. on Communities and Technologies, pp. 65-79. Kluwer Academic Publishers (2003)
- Ye, Y., Kishida, K.: Toward an Understanding of the Motivation Open Source Software Developers. In: Proc. ICSE 2003, pp. 419-429 (2003)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Usage, costs, and benefits of continuous integration in open-source projects
Hilton, M., Tunnell, T., Huang, K., Marinov, D., & Dig, D. (2016) · Proceedings of the 31st IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/2970276.2970358 · Cited by 342 · see citing works
Maruping, L. M., Daniel, S. L., & Cataldo, M. (2019) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2019/13928 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Codes of Conduct in Open Source
Frluckaj, H., & Howison, J. (2024) · Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-1-4842-9651-6_17 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kuechler, V., Gilbertson, C., & Jensen, C.
- Affiliations
- Oregon State University (US)
- Venue
- IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- AICT-378
- Pages
- 78-93
- ISSN
- 1571-5736 (ISSN-L)
- 1868-4238
- 1861-2288
- OpenAlex
- W2206426301
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.87
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- IFIP International Federation for Information Processing/IFIP (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Oregon State University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Open Source Software Innovations
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Keywords
- free and open source software, gender differences, underrepresentation of women, Buildroot, BusyBox, jaw, parrots
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
