The DOI matches its Crossref record.
advance(d) physical geodesy
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The development and evaluation of the Earth Gravitational Model 2008 (EGM2008)
Pavlis, N. K., Holmes, S. A., Kenyon, S. C., & Factor, J. K. (2012) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/2011jb008916 · Cited by 2,641
First GOCE gravity field models derived by three different approaches
Pail, R., Bruinsma, S., Migliaccio, F., Förste, C., Goiginger, H., Schuh, W.-D., Höck, E., Reguzzoni, M., Brockmann, J. M., Abrikosov, O., et al. (2011) · Journal of Geodesy · doi:10.1007/s00190-011-0467-x · Cited by 502
Theoretical background for the inversion of seismic waveforms including elasticity and attenuation
Tarantola, A. (1988) · pure and applied geophysics · doi:10.1007/bf01772605 · Cited by 334
Mehlstäubler, T. E., Grosche, G., Lisdat, C., Schmidt, P. O., & Denker, H. (2018) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aab409 · Cited by 263
Vertical datum unification for the International Height Reference System (IHRS)
Sánchez, L., & Sideris, M. G. (2017) · Geophysical Journal International · doi:10.1093/gji/ggx025 · Cited by 106
Metadata
- Venue
- Dictionary Geotechnical Engineering/Wörterbuch GeoTechnik
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2014
- Pages
- 19-19
- OpenAlex
- W1611133743
- Cited by
- 1,137
- References
- 0
- Type
- reference entry
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: advance(d) physical geodesy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-642-41714-6_10674
- The paper
- advance(d) physical geodesy. (2014). Dictionary Geotechnical Engineering/Wörterbuch GeoTechnik. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41714-6_10674
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
